Federal contractor · ALBUQUERQUE, NM

METIS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.

METIS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC. received $1.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−81% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $13.5M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($1.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.8M
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
NW6MYLMS2K38
Small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 852.2KFY2017
  2. 0FY2018
  3. 285.4KFY2019
  4. -2.5KFY2020
  5. 123.6KFY2021
  6. 740.9KFY2022
  7. 9.7MFY2025
  8. 1.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$1.8M100.0%
  2. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Hampton city, VA$1.8M100.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Hampton city, VA· Professional services· Dec 11, 2024 – Jun 16, 2026· 80LARC25F0001
  2. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Jun 9, 2026· HQ085926FF164

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $18.3M (5 subawards)

3 primes

  1. PERATON INC.$14.6M80%
    HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward
  2. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  3. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 3 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $6M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $6.9M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $2.7M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $2.4M received
  • FY2025: $11.1M paid out · $1.6M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $18.3M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

9 companies · $11.1M reported

  1. HOUSTON, TX · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ARCADIA, CA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $38M reported

  1. CHANTILLY, VA · 9 subawards · Other telecommunications
  2. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 42 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. MCLEAN, VA · 3 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. KOLN, DEU · 2 entities · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ALACHUA, FL · 70% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.