Federal contractor · CHESAPEAKE, VA

MI TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC.

MI TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. received $37.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−14% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $282.4M. Its largest customer was Federal Acquisition Service ($37M).

Obligations · FY2026
$37.1M
New awards
6
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
RH63VKMG2Q83
Parent company
MI TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS INC
Small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 498.4KFY2017
  2. 533.9KFY2018
  3. 3.3MFY2019
  4. 19.5MFY2020
  5. 31.2MFY2021
  6. 54.4MFY2022
  7. 29.9MFY2023
  8. 62.6MFY2024
  9. 43.3MFY2025
  10. 37.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$37.9M99.7%
  2. Professional services$105.6K0.3%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $37.1M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $37.1M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. General Services Administration · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Federal Acquisition Service· Norfolk city, VA· IT & telecom· Jun 10, 2020 – Oct 22, 2025· 47QFLA20C0002
  2. Federal Acquisition Service· Norfolk city, VA· Research & development· Aug 5, 2025 – Sep 22, 2026· 47QFLA25F0072
  3. Federal Acquisition Service· Norfolk city, VA· Research & development· Aug 5, 2025 – Aug 7, 2026· 47QFLA25F0071
  4. Federal Acquisition Service· Honolulu County, HI· Research & development· Sep 29, 2025 – Sep 29, 2026· 47QFLA25F0087
  5. Federal Acquisition Service· District of Columbia, DC· Research & development· Dec 29, 2025 – Jun 24, 2026· 47QFLA26F0006
  6. Department of the Navy· Chesapeake city, VA· Professional services· Mar 24, 2026 – Mar 24, 2026· N0018926PW037

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $115.1K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.4M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $280.8K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $494.9K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $2.3M reported

  1. SAN DIEGO, CA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ALEXANDRIA, VA · 3 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. YORK, PA · 1 subaward · Ship and boat building

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GAINESVILLE, VA · 99.8% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Scientific research and development services
  2. PYRAMID SYSTEMS, INC.$87.9M−27% in FY2026
    FAIRFAX, VA · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related services
  3. INFINITY LABS LLC$82.5M−33% in FY2026
    BEAVERCRK TWP, OH · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.