Federal contractor · MISSOULA, MT

MINUTEMAN AVIATION INC

MINUTEMAN AVIATION INC received $4.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 38 awards (−40% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $44.8M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($4.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$4.8M
New awards
38
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
29%
UEI
JRW6FSHD24S3
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.6MFY2017
  2. 3.1MFY2018
  3. 3.2MFY2019
  4. 2.5MFY2020
  5. 624.4KFY2021
  6. 7.2MFY2022
  7. 5.4MFY2023
  8. 6.4MFY2024
  9. 8MFY2025
  10. 4.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$4.5M95%
    18 awards
  2. Departmental Offices$214.8K4.5%
    20 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$4.5M95%
  2. Transportation & logistics$214.8K4.5%

Where the work was performed

  1. Lincoln County, MT$1.6M34%
  2. Missoula County, MT$1.4M29%
  3. Washington County, VA$675.9K14%
  4. Beaverhead County, MT$496.3K10%
  5. McCreary County, KY$458.7K9.6%
  6. Flathead County, MT$124.1K2.6%
  7. Park County, WY$60.1K1.3%
  8. Fergus County, MT$60K1.3%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition29%
    US 39% · $1.4M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions29%
    US 8.7% · $1.4M
  • Urgency justifications0.6%
    US 5.1% · $27.7K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. TYPE II EXCLUSIVE USE FOR LIBBY, MT$5.6M
    Forest Service· Lincoln County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Apr 1, 2024 – Sep 3, 2026· 1202SA24K9212
  2. HSS MATOC TYPE 3 BLACKSBURG VA, CHALLIS ID, N402MA$3.7M
    Forest Service· Washington County, VA· Facilities & utilities· Oct 23, 2023 – Sep 21, 2026· 1202SA24K9315
  3. HSS MATOC TYPE 3 STEARNS KY, HAMILTON MT, N640MA$3.3M
    Forest Service· McCreary County, KY· Facilities & utilities· Jan 31, 2024 – Sep 4, 2026· 1202SA24K9314
  4. HSS MATOC TYPE 3 WISE RIVER, MT N144MA$2.5M
    Forest Service· Beaverhead County, MT· Facilities & utilities· May 29, 2024 – Sep 28, 2026· 1202SA24K9313
  5. 0716-073126 N145MA PKG-72378$331K
    Forest Service· Missoula County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Jul 16, 2026 – Jul 16, 2026· 1202SA26M0784
  6. 0801-081526 N145MA PKG-72634$206.4K
    Forest Service· Missoula County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 1, 2026 – Aug 1, 2026· 1202SA26M0910
  7. 0816-083126 N145MA PKG-73032$198.9K
    Forest Service· Missoula County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 16, 2026 – Aug 16, 2026· 1202SA26M1053
  8. 0805-081526 N109MA PKG-72661$137.8K
    Forest Service· Missoula County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 5, 2026 – Aug 5, 2026· 1202SA26M0921

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MOUNTAIN WEST HELICOPTERS, LLC$19.5M+12% in FY2026
    AMERICAN FORK, UT · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Nonscheduled air transportationDepartmental Offices · Nonscheduled air transportation
  2. IDAHO HELICOPTERS INC$17.3M−22% in FY2026
    BOISE, ID · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Nonscheduled air transportation
  3. D.H. HELICOPTER, INC.$16.2M+104% in FY2026
    MASCOUTAH, IL · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Nonscheduled air transportationDepartmental Offices · Nonscheduled air transportation

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.