Federal contractor · SYRACUSE, NY

MNS PRO COMPANIES, INC.

MNS PRO COMPANIES, INC. received $2.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+18% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $11.5M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($1.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.4M
New awards
5
Sole-source
95%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
LWTQTBG8HE17
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) program
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 22KFY2017
  2. 22.9KFY2018
  3. 37.8KFY2019
  4. 714.3KFY2020
  5. 1.6MFY2021
  6. 1.2MFY2022
  7. 1.9MFY2023
  8. 1.5MFY2024
  9. 2MFY2025
  10. 2.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Defense Logistics Agency$1.7M72%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$478.6K20%
    2 awards
  3. Department of the Army$178.7K7.5%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$1.7M72%
  2. Facilities & utilities$657.3K28%

Where the work was performed

  1. Schenectady County, NY$1.7M72%
  2. Onondaga County, NY$478.6K20%
  3. Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region, CT$114.8K4.8%
  4. Oswego County, NY$63.9K2.7%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition95%
    US 39% · $2.3M
  • Sole-source awards95%
    US 30% · $2.3M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Navy$478.6K
    Department of Defense · 2 awards
  2. Department of the Army$63.9K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SERVICES$3.7M
    Defense Logistics Agency· Schenectady County, NY· Construction & real property· Sep 26, 2024 – Jun 13, 2026· SP800024C0008
  2. BY - CUST - CT019 - WEEKLY$531.7K
    Department of the Army· Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region, CT· Facilities & utilities· Mar 24, 2022 – Mar 24, 2026· W15QKN22C5003
  3. MITCHEL FIELD / GARDEN CITY RECURRING SERVICES BASE YEAR FUNDING TASK ORDER$475.6K
    Department of the Navy· Onondaga County, NY· Facilities & utilities· Nov 12, 2025 – Apr 8, 2026· N4008526F0056
  4. 99TH - A01 - NEW - SNOW - NY051 - OSWEGO COR/RFOS DODAAC: W91ENN PLACE OF PERFORMANCE DODAAC: W16H2W POP: 2 DEC 2025 - 1 DEC 2026 NEW BASE + 4 OPTION YEARS$63.9K
    Department of the Army· Oswego County, NY· Facilities & utilities· Dec 1, 2025 – Feb 11, 2026· W15QKN26FA027
  5. B19 VFD MITCHEL FIELD$3,042
    Department of the Navy· Onondaga County, NY· Facilities & utilities· Jan 8, 2026 – Jan 8, 2026· N4008526F0226

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FRANK O'CONNOR INC.$5.9M−60% in FY2026
    CLIFTON, VA · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Facilities support services
  2. MIRAMAR INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.$5.7M−70% in FY2026
    RIVERSIDE, IL · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Facilities support servicesNavy · Facilities support services
  3. BBFOSTER CONSULTING, PC$1.2M−100% in FY2026
    GREENSBORO, NC · 18% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.