Federal contractor · ALEXANDRIA, VA

MODERN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.

MODERN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC. received $562.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 55 awards (+42% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.1B. Its largest customer was Federal Acquisition Service ($291M).

Obligations · FY2026: $562.8M
New awards: 55
Sole-source: 27%
Single offer: 5.3%

UEI: R8KMUKAJRKJ6

Other than small business

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $562.8M in FY2026 together.

MODERN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.ALEXANDRIA, VA · Family page
Reported parent$562.8M
MODERN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INCHUNTSVILLE, AL
Reported parent$0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

47.2MFY2017
94.4MFY2018
111MFY2019
144.1MFY2020
137.4MFY2021
171.7MFY2022
251.4MFY2023
225.5MFY2024
395.6MFY2025
562.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

Federal Acquisition Service$291M52%
13 awards
Department of the Air Force$144.8M26%
20 awards
Washington Headquarters Services$44.5M7.9%
6 awards
Defense Information Systems Agency$23.6M4.2%
3 awards
Missile Defense Agency$20.3M3.6%
5 awards
Department of the Army$15.9M2.8%
2 awards
Immediate Office of the Secretary of Defense$14M2.5%
1 awards
U.S. Customs and Border Protection$7.4M1.3%
2 awards
Department of the Navy$1.1M0.2%
2 awards
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency$199.7K0.0%
1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Research & development$296.9M53%
Professional services$141.2M25%
IT & telecom$101.4M18%
Equipment maintenance$23.2M4.1%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Low competition32%
US 39% · $181.9M
Sole-source awards27%
US 30% · $151.8M
Single-offer competitions5.3%
US 8.8% · $30.1M
Urgency justifications0.0%
US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

Department of the Air Force$112.4M
Department of Defense · 1 awards
Defense Information Systems Agency$23.6M
Department of Defense · 2 awards
Immediate Office of the Secretary of Defense$14M
Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

THE OBJECTIVE OF THE ARCWERX ARTEMIS ACQUISITION IS TO PROVIDE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, INNOVATIVE R&D, SW DEVELOPMENT, DIGITAL ENGINEERING, AIRCRAFT AND AEROSPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION AND TESTING, MISSION CONCEPTS OF OPERATION, AND TRAINING.$219.5M
Federal Acquisition Service· Pima County, AZ· Research & development· Dec 16, 2024 – Sep 25, 2026· 47QFSA25F0011
DIGITAL BLOODHOUND$129.9M
Federal Acquisition Service· El Paso County, CO· Research & development· Jul 30, 2024 – Sep 24, 2026· 47QFMA24F0023
MODERNIZATION AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT II - MES II$75.4M
Federal Acquisition Service· Pima County, AZ· Professional services· Jul 23, 2021 – Aug 11, 2026· 47QFSA21F0098
TO PROTOTYPE AND DELIVER PROCESSES FOR THE SPACE COMMAND AND CONTROL MISSION AREA WITHIN BATTLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND, CONTROL, AND COMMUNICATIONS EXECUTIVE PORTFOLIO.$67.5M
Department of the Air Force· Los Angeles County, CA· IT & telecom· Jan 10, 2025 – Jun 10, 2026· FA880625CB001
BCS STS3 AAS$58.6M
Federal Acquisition Service· Los Angeles County, CA· Professional services· Feb 3, 2023 – Aug 4, 2026· 47QFPA23F0007
MOBILE USER OBJECTIVE SYSTEM (MUOS) SYSTEM ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES (SESS)$57.8M
Federal Acquisition Service· Los Angeles County, CA· Professional services· Oct 18, 2022 – Aug 31, 2026· 47QFPA23F0002
R&D CONCEPTS AND PERFORMANCE LAB (CAPL)$56.1M
Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Sep 17, 2020 – May 14, 2026· HQ086020C0006
COM 3.2 TESTING AND EVALUATION SUPPORT$50.3M
Federal Acquisition Service· Okaloosa County, FL· Professional services· Nov 30, 2023 – Sep 24, 2026· 47QFSA24F0010

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

Sub-contracts: $89.2M (88 subawards)

53 sub-recipients

SERCO INC$18.7M21%
HERNDON, VA · 2 subawards
STERLING COMPUTERS CORPORATION$7.2M8.1%
NORTH SIOUX CITY, SD · 13 subawards
RECRO CORPORATION$6M6.7%
FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward
KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC$5.3M6.0%
CHANTILLY, VA · 2 subawards
GEORGIA TECH APPLIED RESEARCH CORP$5.1M5.7%
ATLANTA, GA · 1 subaward
HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP$4.8M5.4%
MC LEAN, VA · 1 subaward
BGI LLC$4.2M4.7%
AKRON, OH · 1 subaward
CYBERSPATIAL INC$3.9M4.4%
ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward
ALLEN INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS LLC$3.8M4.2%
STAFFORD, VA · 1 subaward
EPOCH CONCEPTS LLC$3.5M3.9%
LITTLETON, CO · 7 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

Sub-contracts: $4.7M (3 subawards)

2 primes

BEYOND NEW HORIZONS, LLC$3.2M67%
HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 subawards
KRATOS S2, INC$1.5M33%
COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 16% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

FY2021: $56.9M paid out · $264.2M received
FY2022: $53.2M paid out · $33.8M received
FY2023: $221.9M paid out · $70.4M received
FY2024: $243.9M paid out · $131.5M received
FY2025: $347.4M paid out · $233.1M received
FY2026: $89.2M paid out · $4.7M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

233 companies · $1B reported

ENSCO INC$241.2M
SPRINGFIELD, VA · 5 subawards · Scientific research and development services
DS TECHNOLOGIES LLC$83.3M
HAGERSTOWN, MD · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
RAFT LLC$53.9M
MC LEAN, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

36 companies · $791.5M reported

TORCH TECHNOLOGIES INC$246.8M
HUNTSVILLE, AL · 227 subawards · Scientific research and development services
PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC.$229.8M
CENTREVILLE, VA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
KBR SERVICES, LLC$60.3M
HOUSTON, TX · 49 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 21 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

KRATOS S2, INC$329.4M−55% in FY2026
COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 9 entities · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesMissile Defense Agency · Scientific research and development services+1 more
FRONTIER TECHNOLOGY INC$246.9M−49% in FY2026
BEAVERCREEK, OH · 18% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services+1 more
AXIENT LLC$264.2M−29% in FY2026
ARLINGTON, VA · 18% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of MODERN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC. (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

Modern Technology Solutions, Inc.AI match · 99%
MODERN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC. (MTSI)AI match · 99%

Lobbying · 2025: $280K; 4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026: $960K
PAC giving · 2026: $100.5K; 1 PAC

Lobbying by year

2023$240K
4 reports
2024$280K
4 reports
2025$280K
4 reports
2026$160K
2 reports

Top issues

Defense14 reports

Who was contacted

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
U.S. SENATE14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

J.A. Green and Company (formerly LLC)$960K
14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

Republican$78K78%
Democratic$22.5K22%

PACs sponsored

MODERN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC. (MTSI) LEADERS FOR ENDURING SOLUTIONS$196.3K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Members whose campaigns received from its PACs, 2026 cycle

Robert B. Aderholt$10K
R-AL-4 · House · 1 PAC
Jeff Crank$10K
R-CO-5 · House · 1 PAC
Mike Rogers$10K
R-AL-3 · House · 1 PAC
Dale W. Strong$10K
R-AL-5 · House · 1 PAC
Michael R. Turner$10K
R-OH-10 · House · 1 PAC
Marcy Kaptur$8,500
D-OH-9 · House · 1 PAC
Robert J. Wittman$7,500
R-VA-1 · House · 1 PAC
Ken Calvert$5,000
R-CA-41 · House · 1 PAC
Susan M. Collins$5,000
R-ME · Senate · 1 PAC
Tom Cole$5,000
R-OK-4 · House · 1 PAC

$100.5K of the $100.5K its PACs gave to federal candidates went to 17 members of Congress.

Members whose campaigns received from its PACs, 2024 cycle

Robert B. Aderholt$10K
R-AL-4 · House · 1 PAC
Marcy Kaptur$10K
D-OH-9 · House · 1 PAC
Dale W. Strong$10K
R-AL-5 · House · 1 PAC
Michael R. Turner$10K
R-OH-10 · House · 1 PAC
Jim Banks$5,000
R-IN · Senate · 1 PAC

Direct and in-kind contributions the members' campaigns received (FEC), net of refunds. Party and seat are the member's current or latest.

Bills named in its lobbying reports

H.R. 8774 · Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 20252 reports
118th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2024
S. 4921 · Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 20252 reports
118th Congress · Reported by committee · 2024
H.R. 3838 · Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20262 reports
119th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2025
H.R. 4016 · Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 20262 reports
119th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2025
S. 2296 · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20262 reports

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.