Federal contractor · ALBUQUERQUE, NM

MONTECH INC

MONTECH INC received $9.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 68 awards (−20% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $81.2M. Its largest customer was Department of Energy ($3.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$9.2M
New awards
68
Sole-source
64%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
ZLQWLEQ5HJ49
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.5MFY2017
  2. 2.3MFY2018
  3. 2.8MFY2019
  4. 5.8MFY2020
  5. 9.5MFY2021
  6. 11.4MFY2022
  7. 10.3MFY2023
  8. 15.9MFY2024
  9. 11.5MFY2025
  10. 9.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of Energy$3.1M34%
    4 awards
  2. U.S. Geological Survey$2.6M28%
    46 awards
  3. Indian Health Service$1.8M19%
    3 awards
  4. Department of the Army$853.1K9.3%
    2 awards
  5. Department of the Air Force$811.5K8.9%
    4 awards
  6. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education$234.5K2.6%
    3 awards
  7. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources$148.4K1.6%
    1 awards
  8. Bureau of Reclamation$97.7K1.1%
    1 awards
  9. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration$93.8K1.0%
    1 awards
  10. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$3.7M40%
  2. Facilities & utilities$3.1M34%
  3. Construction & real property$1.3M14%
  4. IT & telecom$803.7K8.8%
  5. Transportation & logistics$225.9K2.5%
  6. Education & social services$60.7K0.7%
  7. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Bernalillo County, NM$5.5M60%
  2. Jefferson County, CO$2M21%
  3. Minnehaha County, SD$854.6K9.3%
  4. Pulaski County, MO$627.2K6.8%
  5. Santa Fe County, NM$609.7K6.7%
  6. San Diego County, CA$93.8K1.0%
  7. Arapahoe County, CO$60.5K0.7%
  8. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition64%
    US 39% · $5.9M
  • Sole-source awards64%
    US 30% · $5.9M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications11%
    US 5.1% · $1M

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. U.S. Geological Survey$2.1M
    Department of the Interior · 20 awards
  2. Indian Health Service$1M
    Department of Health and Human Services · 2 awards
  3. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources$148.4K
    Department of Health and Human Services · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. SECURITY SERVICES$11.1M
    Department of Energy· Bernalillo County, NM· Facilities & utilities· Nov 30, 2020 – Jul 13, 2026· 89233121CNA000172
  2. USGS EROS SECURITY SERVICES$7.2M
    U.S. Geological Survey· Minnehaha County, SD· Facilities & utilities· Feb 17, 2021 – Sep 2, 2026· 140G0121C0004
  3. MANAGEMENT AND STAFF SUPPORT SERVICES (MS3)$4.8M
    Department of the Air Force· Bernalillo County, NM· Professional services· Apr 28, 2023 – Apr 27, 2026· FA942223C0002
  4. SUPPORT IS REQUESTED FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY IDAHO OPERATIONS OFFICE (DOE-ID) PERSONNEL SECURITY PROGRAM AT THE IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY (INL). THE PERSONNEL SECURITY PROGRAM WORK INVOLVES THE PROCESSING, ANALYZING, ADJUDICATI$4.1M
    Department of Energy· Bonneville County, ID· Professional services· Dec 30, 2020 – Jul 6, 2026· 89243221CNE000020
  5. REAL ESTATE REVIEW & PROCESSING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR OTS$3.3M
    Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Bernalillo County, NM· Professional services· Sep 9, 2024 – Sep 2, 2026· 140A1624F0103
  6. MSBL IT/SIM SUPPORT CONTRACT BASE$2.9M
    Department of the Army· Pulaski County, MO· IT & telecom· Feb 18, 2022 – Feb 20, 2026· W911S722C0006
  7. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, GIS AND GEOLOGICAL GRAPHING$1.9M
    U.S. Geological Survey· Jefferson County, CO· IT & telecom· May 5, 2021 – May 15, 2026· 140G0221C0008
  8. SWSFC/OMD ADMINISTRATIVE AND BUSINESS SUPPORT SERVICES$1.8M
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· May 3, 2021 – Jan 28, 2026· 1305M321FNFFR0059

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $3.2M (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC$3.2M100%
    LANHAM, MD · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $500K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $3.2M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $3.7M reported

  1. KBR SERVICES, LLC$3.7M
    HOUSTON, TX · 2 subawards

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 30 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. COOPER ZIETZ ENGINEERS, INC.$8.1M−49% in FY2026
    PORTLAND, OR · 15% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesIndian Health Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources · Facilities support services
  2. HANA ENTERPRISES, INC.$18M+166% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 15% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Investigation and security services
  3. ECODATA ANALYTICS LLC$11M+1,168% in FY2026
    SEATTLE, WA · 13% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.