Federal contractor · SEATTLE, WA

ECODATA ANALYTICS LLC

ECODATA ANALYTICS LLC received $10.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+1,168% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $13.3M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education ($9.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$10.2M
New awards
6
Sole-source
9.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
K181JWTAK9B1
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 372.4KFY2018
  2. 377.7KFY2019
  3. 0FY2020
  4. 437.9KFY2021
  5. 431.2KFY2022
  6. 727KFY2023
  7. -16.8KFY2024
  8. 803.9KFY2025
  9. 10.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$9.3M91%
  2. IT & telecom$916.1K9.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Ada County, ID$916.1K9.0%
  2. King County, WA$219.7K2.2%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition9.0%
    US 39% · $916.1K
  • Sole-source awards9.0%
    US 30% · $916.1K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Jefferson County, CO· Professional services· Feb 24, 2026 – Aug 18, 2026· 140A1626F0018
  2. National Park Service· Ada County, ID· IT & telecom· Jul 17, 2025 – Jun 3, 2026· 140PS125C0005
  3. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· King County, WA· Professional services· May 29, 2026 – May 29, 2026· 140A1626F0045
  4. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Jefferson County, CO· Professional services· Jul 29, 2026 – Jul 29, 2026· 140A1626F0080
  5. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Jefferson County, CO· Professional services· Jul 30, 2026 – Jul 30, 2026· 140A1626F0081
  6. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Jefferson County, CO· Professional services· Sep 3, 2026 – Sep 3, 2026· 140A1626F0100

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $76.8K reported

  1. SEATTLE, WA · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MANAGED BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC$14.5M−140% in FY2026
    COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesNational Park Service · Computer systems design and related services
  2. COOPER ZIETZ ENGINEERS, INC.$8.1M−49% in FY2026
    PORTLAND, OR · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. DAVENPORT, IA · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.