Federal contractor · RIDGECREST, CA

NEW DIRECTIONS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NEW DIRECTIONS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. received $37.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 47 awards (−5.5% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $291M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($37.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$37.2M
New awards
47
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
1.7%
UEI
GF82WQ7CMEL4
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 16.4MFY2017
  2. 21.7MFY2018
  3. 21.4MFY2019
  4. 31.1MFY2020
  5. 41MFY2021
  6. 26.2MFY2022
  7. 29.6MFY2023
  8. 27MFY2024
  9. 39.3MFY2025
  10. 37.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$37.2M100.0%
    46 awards
  2. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$25.3M68%
  2. IT & telecom$7.3M20%
  3. Equipment maintenance$4.6M12%
  4. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Ventura County, CA$19.8M53%
  2. Kern County, CA$17.4M47%
  3. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition1.7%
    US 39% · $625.7K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions1.7%
    US 8.7% · $625.7K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, PORT HUENEME DIVISION (NSWC PHD)$87M
    Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Professional services· Apr 17, 2020 – Apr 21, 2026· N6339420F3000
  2. ENGINEERING, PROGRAM AND TECHNICAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES NEEDED TO HELP ATSO IMPROVE THEIR LEADERSHIP IN ELECTRONIC ATTACK (EA) AND ACTIVE EMITTER SYSTEMS FOR THREAT SIMULATION.$12.3M
    Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Jun 10, 2025 – Jun 12, 2026· N6893625F3002
  3. IMITSS$11.3M
    Department of the Navy· Kern County, CA· IT & telecom· May 2, 2025 – Apr 21, 2026· N6893625F3001
  4. THIS REQUIREMENT IS FOR CYBER SECURITY SUPPORT SERVICES (CSSS) FOR THE DIGITAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS AND CYBER (DITAC) DEPARTMENT.$3.4M
    Department of the Navy· Kern County, CA· IT & telecom· Jun 29, 2023 – Jan 22, 2026· N6893623F3001
  5. EVOLVED SEA SPARROW MISSILE TASK ORDER$3M
    Department of the Navy· Kern County, CA· Professional services· Feb 29, 2024 – Apr 2, 2026· N6893624F0226
  6. ENERGETICS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT TASK ORDER$2.7M
    Department of the Navy· Kern County, CA· Professional services· Feb 29, 2024 – Mar 10, 2026· N6893624F0230
  7. ESS VI TO 16(24F0654) NEW TASK ORDER SENSORS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING$2.5M
    Department of the Navy· Kern County, CA· Professional services· Aug 15, 2024 – Jun 9, 2026· N6893624F0654
  8. ESS VII TO 18(24F0639) NEW TASK ORDER JDF SUPPORT$2.4M
    Department of the Navy· Kern County, CA· Professional services· Aug 15, 2024 – Jun 8, 2026· N6893624F0639

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $269.4K (2 subawards)

1 sub-recipient

  1. SAALEX CORP$269.4K100%
    WASHINGTON, DC · 2 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 0.7% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $2.1M paid out · $1.9M received
  • FY2022: $3M paid out · $932.9K received
  • FY2023: $2.3M paid out · $207.1K received
  • FY2024: $9.3M paid out · $30.9M received
  • FY2025: $865.6K paid out · $2M received
  • FY2026: $269.4K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

5 companies · $17.9M reported

  1. SAALEX CORP$6.1M
    WASHINGTON, DC · 18 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$5.5M
    RESTON, VA · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. DCS CORPORATION$3.2M
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 9 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $35.9M reported

  1. ADVANCED SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES LLC$31.5M
    RIDGECREST, CA · 12 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. SMARTRONIX, LLC$2.1M
    HOLLYWOOD, MD · 4 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. AMENTUM SERVICES, INC.$1.2M
    GERMANTOWN, MD · 5 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. EAGLE SYSTEMS INC$99.8M−16% in FY2026
    CALIFORNIA, MD · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. DELTA RESOURCES, INC.$98M−21% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ADAPT FORWARD LLC$97.8M−68% in FY2026
    NORTH CHARLESTON, SC · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.