Federal contractor · WASHINGTON, DC

SAALEX CORP

SAALEX CORP received $8.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 14 awards (−51% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $277.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($8.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$8.6M
New awards
14
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
KU81PJLZY1N3
Other than small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $21.4M in FY2026 together.

  1. SAALEX CORPWASHINGTON, DC · Family page
    $8.6M
  2. $12.8M
  3. SAALEX CORPRIDGECREST, CA
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 39.7MFY2017
  2. 57.8MFY2018
  3. 45MFY2019
  4. 27.2MFY2020
  5. 18.7MFY2021
  6. 23.8MFY2022
  7. 20.6MFY2023
  8. 18.6MFY2024
  9. 17.7MFY2025
  10. 8.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 11 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$4.1M48%
  2. Equipment maintenance$2.4M28%
  3. IT & telecom$2.1M24%
  4. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Riverside County, CA· Professional services· Apr 27, 2022 – Jun 5, 2026· N6426722F3001
  2. Department of the Navy· Riverside County, CA· Professional services· May 12, 2017 – Mar 31, 2026· N6426717F3000
  3. Department of the Navy· Kern County, CA· IT & telecom· Aug 11, 2022 – Apr 13, 2026· N6893622F3000
  4. Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Professional services· Oct 26, 2017 – Jun 9, 2026· N6426718F3001
  5. Department of the Navy· Kern County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Aug 12, 2024 – Jun 12, 2026· N6893624F3010
  6. Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Mar 1, 2017 – Jun 8, 2026· N6893614C0076
  7. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Apr 26, 2024 – Apr 21, 2026· N6426724F3002
  8. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Aug 17, 2017 – Mar 3, 2026· N6426717F3003

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.4M (14 subawards)

7 sub-recipients

  1. NORTH CHARLESTON, SC · 5 subawards
  2. MC LEAN, VA · 1 subaward
  3. CRITICALTILT, INC.$224.2K16%
    HENDERSON, NV · 3 subawards
  4. BUFFALO GROVE, IL · 1 subaward
  5. LAS VEGAS, NV · 2 subawards
  6. PETALUMA, CA · 1 subaward
  7. GREAT MILLS, MD · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $269.4K (2 subawards)

1 prime

  1. RIDGECREST, CA · 2 subawards

Its reported sub-contracts equal 16% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $2.2M paid out · $3.6M received
  • FY2022: $1.3M paid out · $1.8M received
  • FY2023: $1.2M paid out · $1M received
  • FY2024: $2.3M paid out · $5.6M received
  • FY2025: $1.5M paid out · $764.6K received
  • FY2026: $1.4M paid out · $269.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

35 companies · $21.1M reported

  1. PAWCATUCK, CT · 22 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. MCLEAN, VA · 17 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. RESTON, VA · 23 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $21.2M reported

  1. YORK, PA · 31 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. RIDGECREST, CA · 18 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. PAWCATUCK, CT · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HONOLULU, HI · 2 entities · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ALEXANDRIA INSIGHTS, INC.$79.7M−43% in FY2026
    STAFFORD, VA · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ANCHORAGE, AK · 2 entities · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of SAALEX CORP (3 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • SAALEX CORPAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$187.5K
6 reports
Lobbying · 2025–2026
$282.5K
PAC giving · 2026
$15.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2025$187.5K
    6 reports
  2. 2026$95K
    3 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense9 reports
  2. Aerospace8 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations7 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES9 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE9 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. MOUNTAIN VIEW PARTNERS DC, LLC$262.5K
    8 reports
  2. FRONTERA GROUP$20K
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$13K84%
  2. Democratic$2,50016%

PACs sponsored

  • SAALEX CORP POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$36.1K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.