Federal contractor · ALLEN, TX

NO MAGIC INCORPORATED

NO MAGIC INCORPORATED received -$24.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−214% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $9.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy (-$8,748).

Obligations · FY2026
-$24.6K
New awards
3
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
HJGPH4M2GCZ9
Parent company
NO MAGIC INCORPORATED
Small businessVeteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 981.8KFY2017
  2. 1.9MFY2018
  3. 3.5MFY2019
  4. 1.8MFY2020
  5. 983.6KFY2021
  6. 203.4KFY2022
  7. 308.4KFY2023
  8. 198.6KFY2024
  9. 21.5KFY2025
  10. -24.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy-$8,7480.0%
    2 awards
  2. Defense Contract Management Agency-$15.9K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. CAMEO SYSTEMS MODELER$207.3K
    Department of the Navy· Collin County, TX· IT & telecom· Jun 30, 2023 – Oct 23, 2025· N0016423FC021
  2. SOFTWARE ASSURANCE$105.8K
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Collin County, TX· IT & telecom· Aug 17, 2020 – Nov 25, 2025· N0016420FC048
  3. SOFTWARE ASSURANCE$70.1K
    Department of the Navy· Collin County, TX· IT & telecom· Jun 21, 2023 – Oct 23, 2025· N0016423FC028

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $389.9K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $335.7K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $95.1K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $43K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

10 companies · $863.7K reported

  1. AMENTUM SERVICES, INC.$165.3K
    CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$146.1K
    FORT WORTH, TX · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED$117.7K
    PASCAGOULA, MS · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CONCOURSE TECH INC.$227.3K−61% in FY2026
    BROOKLYN, NY · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Software publishersNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ELSYCA, INC.$232K−60% in FY2026
    AURORA, CO · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Software publishersNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. TICRA FOND$154.7K−9.5% in FY2026
    KOEBENHAVN K, DNK · 79% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Software publishersNavy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.