Federal contractor · CAMDEN, AR
NTS TECHNICAL SYSTEMS LLC
NTS TECHNICAL SYSTEMS LLC received $288.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+102% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $5.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($288.2K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $288.2K
- New awards
- 2
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- JHC5BTJWNFA5
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $629.7K in FY2026 together.
- NTS TECHNICAL SYSTEMS LLCCAMDEN, AR · Family page$288.2K
- NTS TECHNICAL SYSTEMS, LLCRUSTBURG, VA$341.5K
AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 775.5KFY2017
- 2MFY2018
- 266.6KFY2019
- 609.6KFY2020
- 389.4KFY2021
- 1.3KFY2022
- 397.9KFY2023
- 208.6KFY2024
- 142.9KFY2025
- 288.2KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$288.2K100%2 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Professional services$288.2K100%
Where the work was performed
- Ouachita County, AR$288.2K100%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Navy· Ouachita County, AR· Professional services· Jun 5, 2026 – Jun 5, 2026· N0017426F1114
- Department of the Navy· Ouachita County, AR· Professional services· Oct 28, 2025 – Oct 28, 2025· N0017426F1009
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
- Sub-contracts: $394.2K (2 subawards)
2 primes
- PERATON INC.$319.3K81%HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward
- BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.$74.9K19%MAPLE GROVE, MN · 1 subaward
By fiscal year
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $324.7K received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $167.6K received
- FY2024: $0 paid out · $752.4K received
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $260K received
- FY2026: $0 paid out · $394.2K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
15 companies · $5.9M reported
- FORT WORTH, TX · 7 subawards · Ship and boat building
- PASCAGOULA, MS · 13 subawards · Ship and boat building
- GROTON, CT · 12 subawards · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- PI2E JV LLP$1.7M−100% in FY2026COLUMBUS, OH · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- CARL AMBER BRIAN ISAIAH AND ASSOCIATES CO.$2.1M−84% in FY2026FREDERICKSBURG, VA · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.