Federal contractor · ROCHESTER, MI

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY

No contract obligations recorded for OAKLAND UNIVERSITY in FY2026. Since FY2017: $1.4M. It also received $42.1M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
HJTLACN81NK1
Parent company
OAKLAND UNIVERSITY
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 157.1KFY2017
  2. 209.3KFY2018
  3. 169.4KFY2019
  4. 262.6KFY2020
  5. 228.2KFY2021
  6. 151.1KFY2022
  7. 81.2KFY2023
  8. 73.5KFY2024
  9. 82.1KFY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for OAKLAND UNIVERSITY in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY received $42.1M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 214 actions (16 new awards), −2% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program ($31.8M).

Assistance · FY2026
$42.1M
New awards
16
Actions
214
Since FY2021
$257.6M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 68.3MFY2021
  2. 24.2MFY2022
  3. 37.7MFY2023
  4. 42.3MFY2024
  5. 43MFY2025
  6. 42.1MFY2026

By type

  1. Direct payments$33.6M80%
  2. Grants$8.5M20%

Top programs

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program$31.8M76%
  2. 93.859 · Biomedical Research and Research Training$1.7M4.0%
  3. 11.617 · Congressionally-Identified Projects$1M2.5%
  4. 84.033 · Federal Work-Study Program$1M2.4%
  5. 93.867 · Vision Research$965.8K2.3%
  6. 47.076 · Stem Education (Formerly Education and Human Resources)$792.2K1.9%
  7. 84.047 · Trio Upward Bound$739.4K1.8%
  8. 47.041 · Engineering$629.8K1.5%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Health and Human Services
  2. Department of Health and Human Services
  3. Department of Commerce
  4. Department of Health and Human Services
  5. Department of the Interior

Largest awards

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 27, 2025 – Sep 16, 2026· P063P250237
  2. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 29, 2024 – Jul 7, 2026· P063P240237
  3. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 29, 2023 – Jul 7, 2026· P063P230237
  4. 93.853 · Extramural Research Programs in the Neurosciences and Neurological Disorders· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Aug 19, 2021 – Aug 7, 2026· R01NS106879
  5. 84.047 · Trio Upward Bound· Department of Education· Project grant· May 23, 2022 – Jul 29, 2026· P047A220760
  6. 93.867 · Vision Research· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Apr 9, 2021 – Feb 11, 2026· R01EY025291

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $159.8K (6 subawards)

5 primes

  1. AUBURN UNIVERSITY, AL · 1 subaward
  2. ANN ARBOR, MI · 1 subaward
  3. AMHERST, MA · 1 subaward
  4. IOWA CITY, IA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $408K paid out · $3.7M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.2M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $3.8M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $2M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.6M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $159.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

3 companies · $408K reported

  1. LINCOLN, NE · 2 subawards
  2. MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 2 subawards
  3. DETROIT, MI · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

21 companies · $12.3M reported

  1. ANN ARBOR, MI · 16 subawards
  2. LANSING, MI · 11 subawards
  3. LUBBOCK, TX · 8 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. VICENZA, ITA · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ABU DHABI, ARE · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. BATTISTELLA FRANCO$183K−89% in FY2026
    VICENZA, ITA · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Oakland UniversityAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$40K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$140K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$40K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$40K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$40K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$20K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Automotive industry14 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  3. Defense14 reports
  4. Education14 reports
  5. Science and technology14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES12 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE12 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. THE BURNHAM GROUP LLC$140K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.