Federal contractor · RESTON, VA
OCTO CONSULTING GROUP LLC
OCTO CONSULTING GROUP LLC received $19.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+5.4% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $639.3M. Its largest customer was National Institutes of Health ($9.1M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $19.9M
- New awards
- 6
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- X5V6UB9HVCD8
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 73.6MFY2017
- 94.6MFY2018
- 87.1MFY2019
- 95.9MFY2020
- 91.3MFY2021
- 59.7MFY2022
- 51.3MFY2023
- 47.2MFY2024
- 18.8MFY2025
- 19.9MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- National Institutes of Health$9.1M46%2 awards
- Departmental Offices$7.2M36%1 awards
- Federal Acquisition Service$3.6M18%1 awards
- 1 awards
- Department of the Air Force-$5000.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- IT & telecom$19.9M100%
Where the work was performed
- Fairfax County, VA$9.1M46%
- Montgomery County, MD$7.2M36%
- District of Columbia, DC$3.6M18%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · -$500
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · -$500
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Federal Acquisition Service· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Oct 20, 2020 – Jan 23, 2026· 47QDCB21F0003
- National Institutes of Health· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Jun 12, 2023 – May 26, 2026· 75N91023F00001
- National Institutes of Health· Montgomery County, MD· IT & telecom· Sep 16, 2020 – Jun 26, 2026· 75N92020F00247
- LIMS FA$7.3MFederal Bureau of Investigation· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Sep 26, 2022 – Dec 10, 2025· 15F06722F0001065
- Department of the Air Force· Prince George's County, MD· Professional services· Jul 29, 2022 – Apr 13, 2026· FA701422F0196
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $798.1K received
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $5.6M received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $3.3M received
- FY2024: $0 paid out · $405K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
6 companies · $10.1M reported
- CHANTILLY, VA · 3 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
- ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
- CALIFORNIA, MD · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- DIGITAL INFUZION, LLC$102.3M−39% in FY2026ROCKVILLE, MD · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Computer systems design and related servicesDepartmental Offices · Computer systems design and related services
- DYNANET CORPORATION$106.8M−38% in FY2026ELKRIDGE, MD · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Computer systems design and related servicesDepartmental Offices · Computer systems design and related services
- TAHKOX E2 SERVICES, LLC$32.7MCANEY, KS · 3 entities · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Computer systems design and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.