Federal contractor · SCOTTSDALE, AZ

ODLE MANAGEMENT GROUP, L.L.C.

ODLE MANAGEMENT GROUP, L.L.C. received $67.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 9 awards (+83% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $657.5M. Its largest customer was Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management ($67.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$67.1M
New awards
9
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
NKU3DN6KB1N4
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $81.3M in FY2026 together.

  1. ODLE MANAGEMENT GROUP, L.L.C.SCOTTSDALE, AZ · Family page
    $67.1M
  2. $14.2M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 80.2MFY2017
  2. 84.9MFY2018
  3. 73.4MFY2019
  4. 92.3MFY2020
  5. 88.1MFY2021
  6. 37.8MFY2022
  7. 44.4MFY2023
  8. 52.8MFY2024
  9. 36.6MFY2025
  10. 67.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 9 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Education & social services$67.3M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Tulsa County, OK$283.7K0.4%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$1,801
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · -$1,801
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management· Allegheny County, PA· Education & social services· May 27, 2021 – Jul 16, 2026· 1605JE21C0013
  2. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management· Worth County, GA· Education & social services· Mar 29, 2024 – Aug 27, 2026· 1605JE24C0013
  3. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management· Amherst County, VA· Education & social services· May 26, 2022 – Sep 8, 2026· 1605JE22C0016
  4. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management· Tulsa County, OK· Facilities & utilities· May 26, 2017 – Feb 10, 2026· 1630J417C0003
  5. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management· Pulaski County, AR· Facilities & utilities· Dec 6, 2016 – Feb 10, 2026· DOLETA16C0084
  6. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management· Orleans Parish, LA· Facilities & utilities· Apr 19, 2017 – Aug 3, 2026· 1630DC17H0007
  7. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management· Crawford County, IA· Education & social services· Aug 9, 2023 – Jun 26, 2026· 1605JW23F00009
  8. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management· Maricopa County, AZ· Education & social services· Apr 16, 2026 – Sep 24, 2026· 1605JW26F00003

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $45M reported

  1. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES$38.7M
    TALLAHASSEE, FL · 37 subawards
  2. TOPEKA, KS · 4 subawards
  3. PEE DEE REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS$1.5M
    FLORENCE, SC · 1 subaward

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SERRATO CORPORATION$177M+50% in FY2026
    TUCSON, AZ · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management · Technical and trade schools
  2. WEST HENRIETTA, NY · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management · Technical and trade schools
  3. ARBOR E & T LLC$261.9M+43% in FY2026
    LOUISVILLE, KY · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management · Technical and trade schools

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.