Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

OLGOONIK FEDERAL, LLC

OLGOONIK FEDERAL, LLC received $30.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 46 awards (−71% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $459.8M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($38.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$30.3M
New awards
46
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
1.3%
UEI
EGUEUHZLJDE9
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $72.9M in FY2026 together.

  1. OLGOONIK FEDERAL, LLCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page
    $30.3M
  2. OLGOONIK GENERAL, LLCANCHORAGE, AK
    $42.5M
  3. OLGOONIK INNOVATIONS, LLCFAIRFAX, VA
    $156K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 64.6MFY2017
  2. 30MFY2018
  3. 19MFY2019
  4. 53.1MFY2020
  5. 40.6MFY2021
  6. 22MFY2022
  7. 47.3MFY2023
  8. 47.7MFY2024
  9. 105.1MFY2025
  10. 30.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Defense Logistics Agency$38.1M100%
    15 awards
  2. National Institutes of Health$609.9K2.0%
    1 awards
  3. Department of the Army$29.9K0.1%
    6 awards
  4. Department of the Navy$28.8K0.1%
    1 awards
  5. Departmental Offices$14.5K0.0%
    7 awards
  6. Department of State-$8.5M0.0%
    16 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$38.2M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. San Diego County, CA$12.2M40%
  2. Abroad$9M30%
  3. York County, PA$6.3M21%
  4. Houston County, GA$4.3M14%
  5. Oklahoma County, OK$3.4M11%
  6. Dougherty County, GA$1.7M5.6%
  7. Montgomery County, MD$624.4K2.1%
  8. Anchorage Municipality, AK$480.1K1.6%
  9. Cumberland County, NC$242.4K0.8%
  10. Norfolk city, VA$216.3K0.7%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$8.2M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$8.6M
  • Single-offer competitions1.3%
    US 8.7% · $402.9K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. PROVIDE CONTRACT LABOR SUPPORT TO PERFORM GENERAL WAREHOUSE OPERATIONS AT DDSP NEW CUMBERLAND AND NAS MECHANICSBURG ON SECOND (2ND) AND THIRD (3RD) SHIFTS TASK ORDER #16$38.8M
    Defense Logistics Agency· York County, PA· Facilities & utilities· Feb 22, 2024 – Jan 26, 2026· SP330024F5013
  2. SUPPORT OPERATIONS OF THE FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, LABOR, SUPPLIES, ETC. AT THE DISTRIBUTION AND WAREHOUSING FACILITIES.$29.8M
    Defense Logistics Agency· Facilities & utilities· Dec 23, 2024 – May 14, 2026· SP330025F5041
  3. SUPPORT OPERATIONS OF THE FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, LABOR, SUPPLIES, ETC. AT THE DISTRIBUTION AND WAREHOUSING FACILITIES.$17.8M
    Defense Logistics Agency· Calhoun County, AL· Facilities & utilities· Sep 25, 2025 – Mar 24, 2026· SP330025F5024
  4. !8503685608!AF FUELS MANAGEM$16.7M
    Defense Logistics Agency· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Facilities & utilities· Oct 14, 2016 – Oct 1, 2025· SPE60017C5002
  5. PROVIDE WAREHOUSING AND DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS FOR DDDC.$13.2M
    Defense Logistics Agency· San Diego County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Mar 27, 2026 – May 29, 2026· SP330026F5012
  6. 8505894266!AF FUELS MANAGEMENT SERVICES$10.6M
    Defense Logistics Agency· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Facilities & utilities· Sep 25, 2018 – Jan 21, 2026· SPE60318C5053
  7. IGF$6.7M
    Department of State· Prince George's County, MD· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2020 – Aug 24, 2026· 19AQMM20F4468
  8. POST RIYADH FE/BR REPLACE AND REPAIR$5.4M
    Department of State· Construction & real property· Jul 9, 2021 – May 14, 2026· 19AQMM21F2610

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 18 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PHILIPPINE COASTAL STORAGE & PIPELINE CORPORATION$91.8M
    SUBIC BAY FREEPORT ZONE, PHL · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Warehousing and storage
  2. VALIANT TECHNICAL SERVICES INC.$89.7M−108% in FY2026
    CLARKSVILLE, TN · 25% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Warehousing and storage
  3. DGCI CORPORATION$411.3M−99% in FY2026
    MC LEAN, VA · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Warehousing and storage

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.