Federal contractor · OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

ONE GAS INC

ONE GAS INC received $1.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (−55% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $21.2M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($1.3M).

Obligations · FY2026: $1.7M
New awards: 10
Sole-source: 23%
Single offer: 0.0%

UEI: HM2LCY6EPN21
Parent company: ONE GAS, INC.

Other than small business

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

4 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $6.1M in FY2026 together.

ONE GAS INCOKLAHOMA CITY, OK · Family page
Reported parent$1.7M
ONE GAS INCAUSTIN, TX
AI name match · 91%$2.8M
ONE GAS, INCOVERLAND PARK, KS
AI name match · 100%$1.4M
ONE GAS, INC.TULSA, OK
Reported parent$175.8K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

1.2MFY2017
2.1MFY2018
1.2MFY2019
1.8MFY2020
1.6MFY2021
1.4MFY2022
1.8MFY2023
4.7MFY2024
3.7MFY2025
1.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

Defense Logistics Agency$1.3M77%
1 awards
Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons$303.8K18%
3 awards
Internal Revenue Service$61.6K3.7%
2 awards
Bureau of Reclamation$6,9500.4%
1 awards
U.S. Marshals Service$5,0470.3%
1 awards
Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education$7380.0%
2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Facilities & utilities$1.7M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Low competition23%
US 39% · $378.1K
Sole-source awards23%
US 30% · $378.1K
Single-offer competitions0.0%
US 8.8% · $0
Urgency justifications0.0%
US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons$303.8K
Department of Justice · 1 awards

Largest awards

THIS IS A CONTINUATION OF DABT39-01-C-4003, AWARDED ON APRIL 3, 2001, DUE TO THE TRANSFER OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.$3M
Defense Logistics Agency· Comanche County, OK· Facilities & utilities· May 1, 2024 – Jun 1, 2026· SP060024C8362
P4 - CLECO POWER, LLC - MONTHLY SERVICE CHARGES FOR OCTOBER FY25$2.4M
Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons· Rapides Parish, LA· Facilities & utilities· Nov 26, 2024 – Nov 25, 2025· 15B51925F00000014
RENEWAL GAS UTILITY SERVICES (IRS FACILITIES - AUSTIN, TX) FROM OCTOBER 1, 2019 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2024.$270.7K
Internal Revenue Service· Travis County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Oct 1, 2019 – Apr 8, 2026· 205AE920F00002
NATURAL GAS UTILITY SERVICES$152.3K
Internal Revenue Service· Travis County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Oct 1, 2024 – Aug 4, 2026· 205AE925F00002
FY26 NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FOR FCI EL RENO, OKLAHOMA FOR FY-26 - REFLECT ACTUAL USAGE FOR FY 2026$84.4K
Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons· Oklahoma County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Dec 2, 2025 – Sep 3, 2026· 15B50726F00000010
FY25 NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FOR FCI EL RENO, OKLAHOMA FOR FY-25$77.3K
Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons· Oklahoma County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Oct 21, 2024 – Oct 31, 2025· 15B50725F00000013
UTILITY SRVC - NATURAL GAS$51.5K
Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Caddo County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Jul 21, 2021 – Jul 21, 2026· 140A2321F0186
WCF-OT-NEW ONG NATURAL GAS - FY22$24.9K
Bureau of Reclamation· Oklahoma County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Sep 8, 2022 – Aug 25, 2026· 140R6022F0048

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

Sub-contracts: $269.4K (1 subaward)

1 prime

CITY LIGHT & POWER FTR, LLC$269.4K100%
GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $269.4K reported

CITY LIGHT & POWER, INC.$269.4K
GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO · 1 subaward · Utility system construction

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

OMEGA PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC$25.5M−13% in FY2026
FORT LEONARD WOOD, MO · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Natural gas distribution
DAERYUN E&S CO., LTD.$4.5M−31% in FY2026
SEOUL, KOR · 16% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Natural gas distribution
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC$90.2M−18% in FY2026
RALEIGH, NC · 8 entities · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Natural gas distribution

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of ONE GAS INC (4 recipients).

Matched organizations

ONE GAS INC.AI match · 100%

Lobbying · 2025: $80K; 4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026: $280K
PAC giving · 2026: $33.5K; 1 PAC

Lobbying by year

2023$80K
4 reports
2024$80K
4 reports
2025$80K
4 reports
2026$40K
2 reports

Top issues

Energy and nuclear14 reports

Who was contacted

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
U.S. SENATE11 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

DS2 Group, LLC$280K
14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

Republican$32.5K97%
Democratic$1,0003.0%

PACs sponsored

ONE GAS, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$200.3K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Members whose campaigns received from its PACs, 2026 cycle

Tom Cole$5,000
R-OK-4 · House · 1 PAC
Randy K. Weber, Sr.$5,000
R-TX-14 · House · 1 PAC
Ron Estes$3,000
R-KS-4 · House · 1 PAC
Tracey Mann$3,000
R-KS-1 · House · 1 PAC
Craig A. Goldman$2,500
R-TX-12 · House · 1 PAC
Stephanie I. Bice$1,500
R-OK-5 · House · 1 PAC
Kevin Hern$1,500
R-OK-1 · House · 1 PAC
James Lankford$1,500
R-OK · Senate · 1 PAC
Derek Schmidt$1,500
R-KS-2 · House · 1 PAC
Michael Cloud$1,000
R-TX-27 · House · 1 PAC

$31.5K of the $33.5K its PACs gave to federal candidates went to 16 members of Congress.

Members whose campaigns received from its PACs, 2024 cycle

Tom Cole$6,500
R-OK-4 · House · 1 PAC
Frank D. Lucas$5,000
R-OK-3 · House · 1 PAC
Derek Schmidt$5,000
R-KS-2 · House · 1 PAC
Markwayne Mullin$4,500
R-OK · Senate · 1 PAC
Jerry Moran$4,000
R-KS · Senate · 1 PAC

Direct and in-kind contributions the members' campaigns received (FEC), net of refunds. Party and seat are the member's current or latest.

Bills named in its lobbying reports

H.R. 7655 · Pipeline Safety, Modernization, and Expansion Act of 20244 reports
118th Congress · Introduced · 2024
H.R. 6192 · Hands Off Our Home Appliances Act3 reports
118th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2023–2024
H.R. 9938 · Promising Pathway Act 2.01 report
118th Congress · Introduced · 2026

6 of 14 reports (2023–2026) name at least one bill. Bills and resolutions the current reports name in their issue descriptions, by number of reports. A report names what it lobbied on, not which side it took.

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.