Federal contractor · ALPHARETTA, GA

ONSOLVE LLC

ONSOLVE LLC received $104.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−0.4% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $10.9M. Its largest customer was Office of the Chief Financial Officer ($36K).

Obligations · FY2026
$104.6K
New awards
7
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
73%
UEI
U7M7JXRPKGZ8
Parent company
VERITAS CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the PERATON INC. company family: 30 registered entities, $4.1B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. PERATON INC.HERNDON, VA · Family page
    $2.1B
  2. GUIDEHOUSE INC.MC LEAN, VA
    $704.6M
  3. $699.5M
  4. GUIDEHOUSE LLPMCLEAN, VA
    $155.8M
  5. $150.6M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · jev-1.13.0 · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 154KFY2017
  2. 1.1MFY2018
  3. 994.1KFY2019
  4. 4.7MFY2020
  5. 2.9MFY2021
  6. 237KFY2022
  7. 468.6KFY2023
  8. 119.1KFY2024
  9. 105KFY2025
  10. 104.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$72.4K69%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$29.6K28%
  3. Professional services$2,5142.4%

Where the work was performed

  1. Cook County, IL$7,5487.2%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition73%
    US 39% · $75.9K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions73%
    US 8.8% · $75.9K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission· District of Columbia, DC· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 29, 2022 – Jul 28, 2026· 89603022F0015
  2. National Gallery of Art· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Sep 30, 2022 – Aug 21, 2026· 33301122FSS0076
  3. Department of the Air Force· Berkeley County, SC· Professional services· Feb 15, 2023 – Feb 18, 2026· FA441823F0028
  4. Maritime Administration· Nassau County, NY· IT & telecom· Sep 3, 2025 – Sep 2, 2026· 693JF725P000069
  5. Office of the Chief Financial Officer· Fulton County, GA· IT & telecom· Aug 4, 2026 – Aug 4, 2026· 12314426F0277
  6. Public Buildings Service· Cook County, IL· IT & telecom· Apr 3, 2024 – May 28, 2026· 47PF0024F0451
  7. Federal Emergency Management Agency· Volusia County, FL· IT & telecom· Dec 5, 2022 – Nov 21, 2025· 70FBTX23F00000006

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2,093 companies · $11.6B reported

  1. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 125 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. LA PUENTE, CA · 83 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. ROY, UT · 43 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

117 companies · $3.1B reported

  1. ROY, UT · 216 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. RESTON, VA · 82 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. PASADENA, CA · 1 subaward

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 224 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP$11.2B−5.6% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 8 entities · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related servicesArmy · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services+15 more
  2. CACI, INC. - FEDERAL$13.2B−26% in FY2026
    CHANTILLY, VA · 42 entities · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services+6 more
  3. RESTON, VA · 27 entities · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesState · Computer systems design and related services+9 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of PERATON INC. (30 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Chromalloy Gas Turbine, LLCAI match · 100%
  • CHROMALLOY CORPORATION/CHROMALLOY GAS TURBINE LLCAI match · 99%
  • PERATON CORP.AI match · 99%
  • THE GUIDEHOUSE INC.AI match · 98%
  • APTIM CORP.AI match · 92%
Lobbying · 2025
$800K
28 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.3M
$2.3M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$412.5K
4 PACs

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$630K
    14 reports
  2. 2024$380K
    18 reports
  3. 2025$800K
    28 reports
  4. 2026$470K
    14 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense47 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations30 reports
  3. Intelligence and surveillance25 reports
  4. Transportation23 reports
  5. Homeland security20 reports
  6. Aviation, aircraft and airlines16 reports
  7. Government issues16 reports
  8. Computer industry14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES73 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE72 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$2.2M
    26 reports
  2. Monument Advocacy$480K
    14 reports
  3. THE VOGEL GROUP$350K
    6 reports
  4. Cassidy & Associates, Inc.$190K
    7 reports
  5. INNOVATIVE FEDERAL STRATEGIES, LLC$170K
    7 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$269K65%
  2. Democratic$143.5K35%

PACs sponsored

  • PERATON CORP. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (A.K.A. 'PERATON PAC')$262.6K raised this cycle
  • THE GUIDEHOUSE INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (GUIDEHOUSE PAC)$89K raised this cycle
  • CHROMALLOY CORPORATION/CHROMALLOY GAS TURBINE LLC PAC (CHROMALLOY PAC)$0 raised this cycle
  • APTIM CORP. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AKA APTIM PAC)$0 raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.