Federal contractor · ATLANTA, GA

OPEN SAN CONSULTING L.L.C.

OPEN SAN CONSULTING L.L.C. received $16.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−47% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $181.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($12M).

Obligations · FY2026
$16.7M
New awards
7
Sole-source
10%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
CWDSTZNRNXU5
Parent company
OPEN SAN CONSULTING LLC
Small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.7MFY2017
  2. 3MFY2018
  3. 11.5MFY2019
  4. 19.4MFY2020
  5. 19.4MFY2021
  6. 23.6MFY2022
  7. 30.7MFY2023
  8. 23.9MFY2024
  9. 31.6MFY2025
  10. 16.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$12M72%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$3M18%
    1 awards
  3. Department of the Navy$1.8M11%
    2 awards
  4. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards
  5. Defense Information Systems Agency-$0.020.0%
    1 awards
  6. Defense Contract Management Agency-$46K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$11.9M71%
  2. IT & telecom$4.8M29%
  3. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Richmond County, GA$12M72%
  2. Bexar County, TX$3M18%
  3. DeKalb County, GA$1.7M10%
  4. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition10%
    US 39% · $1.7M
  • Sole-source awards10%
    US 30% · $1.7M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications11%
    US 5.1% · $1.8M

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Navy$1.8M
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. G6 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING SERVICES SUPPORT CONTRACT$36.9M
    Department of the Army· Richmond County, GA· Professional services· Sep 26, 2023 – Apr 28, 2026· W9124923C0013
  2. JOINT SERVICE PROVIDER (JSP) INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT FACILITY SERVICES$23.7M
    Defense Information Systems Agency· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Jan 3, 2020 – Nov 20, 2025· HC102820F0053
  3. COMMAND AND CONTROL OF THE INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT SUPPORT FOR COMMAND INTEGRATION LEADS$17.6M
    Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· IT & telecom· Sep 29, 2023 – May 18, 2026· FA830723FB173
  4. NCIS ITCSU SUPPORT SERVICES - BRIDGE CONTRACT$1.8M
    Department of the Navy· DeKalb County, GA· IT & telecom· Mar 9, 2026 – Mar 9, 2026· N0018926CW004
  5. INITIAL AWARD FOR TASK ORDER 001$1.2M
    Defense Contract Management Agency· DeKalb County, GA· Professional services· Mar 28, 2019 – Apr 20, 2026· N6449819F4073
  6. RMF ACCREDIATION$26.9K
    Department of the Navy· DeKalb County, GA· Professional services· Feb 21, 2020 – Apr 30, 2026· N6449820F4048
  7. SCALABLE HOMELAND INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISE LAYERED DEFENSE (SHIELD) INITIAL ORDER.$500
    Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 5, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· HQ085926FE337

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $18.7M (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.$18.7M100%
    FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $8M paid out · $44.9M received
  • FY2025: $423.3K paid out · $3.1M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $18.7M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

5 companies · $8.4M reported

  1. STEELGATE LLC$2.8M
    STERLING, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS, LLC$2.4M
    FAIRFIELD, NJ · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  3. TEKSYSTEMS GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC$1.7M
    HANOVER, MD · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $66.7M reported

  1. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$44.9M
    RESTON, VA · 4 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$20.7M
    GROTON, CT · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. MODERN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.$1.2M
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. OM GROUP, INC$31.4M−25% in FY2026
    PISCATAWAY, NJ · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  2. SEED INNOVATIONS, LLC$80.1M−60% in FY2026
    MONUMENT, CO · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  3. BEAT-ATC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY$26.6M+13% in FY2026
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.