Federal contractor · TULSA, OK

OSAGE NATION ENERGY SERVICES LLC

OSAGE NATION ENERGY SERVICES LLC received $7.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−54% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $37.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($7.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$7.7M
New awards
4
Sole-source
91%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
V1U1FNF1LLV4
Parent company
OSAGE LLC
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $8.9M in FY2026 together.

  1. OSAGE NATION ENERGY SERVICES LLCTULSA, OK · Family page
    $7.7M
  2. $1.2M
  3. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 27.2KFY2019
  2. 1.6MFY2020
  3. 2MFY2021
  4. 3MFY2022
  5. 3.4MFY2023
  6. 3.4MFY2024
  7. 16.6MFY2025
  8. 7.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$7.7M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition91%
    US 39% · $7M
  • Sole-source awards91%
    US 30% · $7M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Honolulu County, HI· Facilities & utilities· Jun 3, 2026 – Jun 3, 2026· W9126G26PA054
  2. Department of the Army· Jefferson County, IN· Facilities & utilities· Jun 10, 2025 – May 14, 2026· W912QR25CA006
  3. Department of the Army· Christian County, KY· Facilities & utilities· Jun 26, 2025 – Feb 19, 2026· W9124825FA129
  4. Department of the Army· Christian County, KY· Facilities & utilities· Mar 19, 2026 – Mar 19, 2026· W9124826FA016

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BALTIMORE, MD · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesArmy · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. Q & A DIVERSIFIED LLC$16.4M−67% in FY2026
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesArmy · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. AYUDA ARCADIS 8A JOINT VENTURE LLC$10.8M−100% in FY2026
    DENVER, CO · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of OSAGE NATION ENERGY SERVICES LLC (3 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Osage NationAI match · 97%
Lobbying · 2025
$0
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$0

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$0
    6 reports
  2. 2024$0
    8 reports
  3. 2025$0
    4 reports
  4. 2026$0
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Indian and Native American affairs3 reports

Who was contacted

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$0
    10 reports
  2. Venable LLP$0
    8 reports
  3. Van Ness Feldman, LLP$0
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.