Federal contractor · EDMOND, OK

THE OSAGE CO, L.L.C

THE OSAGE CO, L.L.C received $1.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+4.2% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $7.5M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education ($1.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.2M
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
MDB2N1V3BGJ1
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-ownedNative-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the OSAGE NATION ENERGY SERVICES LLC company family: 3 registered entities, $8.9M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. OSAGE NATION ENERGY SERVICES LLCTULSA, OK · Family page
    $7.7M
  2. OSAGE PINNACLE DESIGN GROUP LLCSKIATOOK, OK
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 824.8KFY2017
  2. 256.1KFY2018
  3. 748.9KFY2019
  4. 696.5KFY2020
  5. -14.7KFY2021
  6. 869.7KFY2022
  7. 895.8KFY2023
  8. 922.7KFY2024
  9. 1.1MFY2025
  10. 1.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education$1.2M100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$1.2M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. District of Columbia, DC$1.2M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.2M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $1.2M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. TRIBAL COURT ASSESSMENTS PACIFIC REGION$3M
    Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· May 24, 2022 – Jul 14, 2026· 140A1622F0094
  2. TRIBAL COURT ASSESSMENTS WESTERN REGION$2M
    Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jan 28, 2022 – Jul 14, 2026· 140A1622F0028

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH GROUP, L.L.C.$22.3M−70% in FY2026
    BALTIMORE, MD · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesArmy · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. Q & A DIVERSIFIED LLC$16.4M−67% in FY2026
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesArmy · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. AYUDA ARCADIS 8A JOINT VENTURE LLC$10.8M−100% in FY2026
    DENVER, CO · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of OSAGE NATION ENERGY SERVICES LLC (3 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Osage NationAI match · 97%
Lobbying · 2025
$0
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$0

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$0
    6 reports
  2. 2024$0
    8 reports
  3. 2025$0
    4 reports
  4. 2026$0
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Indian and Native American affairs3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. Interior - Dept of (DOI)3 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$0
    10 reports
  2. Venable LLP$0
    8 reports
  3. Van Ness Feldman, LLP$0
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.