Federal contractor · COLUMBIA, MD
OWL CYBER DEFENSE SOLUTIONS LLC
OWL CYBER DEFENSE SOLUTIONS LLC received $8.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−26% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $65.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($4.6M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $8.6M
- New awards
- 6
- Sole-source
- 39%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- DG87J5EZLC94
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- -7.4KFY2018
- 175.4KFY2019
- 365.5KFY2020
- 3.2MFY2021
- 7MFY2022
- 26.7MFY2023
- 8.3MFY2024
- 11.6MFY2025
- 8.6MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$4.6M53%2 awards
- 2 awards
- Missile Defense Agency$32.8K0.4%2 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Research & development$5.2M61%
- IT & telecom$3.4M39%
Where the work was performed
- Howard County, MD$8.6M100.0%
- Madison County, AL$5000.0%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition39%US 39% · $3.3M
- Sole-source awards39%US 30% · $3.3M
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of Defense · 1 awards
Largest awards
- Department of the Air Force· Howard County, MD· Research & development· Mar 23, 2026 – May 28, 2026· FA875026FB002
- P-8A FMS TS/S CDS$3.3M
- Department of the Navy· Howard County, MD· Research & development· Sep 18, 2024 – Apr 22, 2026· N0001424C1156
- Department of the Air Force· Howard County, MD· Research & development· Jul 29, 2025 – Apr 6, 2026· FA875025FB005
- Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Jan 16, 2026 – Jan 16, 2026· HQ085926FG157
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
- Sub-contracts: $2.2M (1 subaward)
1 prime
- LAUREL, MD · 1 subaward
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $2M received
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $9.8M received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $2.9M received
- FY2024: $0 paid out · $41.7M received
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $13M received
- FY2026: $0 paid out · $2.2M received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
13 companies · $71.7M reported
- FORT WORTH, TX · 10 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
- GROTON, CT · 7 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
- HERNDON, VA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- TANGRAM FLEX INC$21.1M+33% in FY2026DAYTON, OH · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
- AUTONODYNE LLC$22.1M+38% in FY2026BOSTON, MA · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
- TRUST AUTOMATION INC$20.4M−100% in FY2026SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.