Federal contractor · SAN DIEGO, CA

PARTEK, INCORPORATED

No contract obligations recorded for PARTEK, INCORPORATED in FY2026. Since FY2017: $2.6M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
GCFJKHNPZM21
Parent company
ILLUMINA, INC.
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ILLUMINA, INC. company family: 2 registered entities, $21.9M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ILLUMINA, INC.SAN DIEGO, CA · Family page
    $21.9M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 288.3KFY2017
  2. 360.3KFY2018
  3. 310.4KFY2019
  4. 395.2KFY2020
  5. 382.8KFY2021
  6. 358.6KFY2022
  7. 301.1KFY2023
  8. 246.6KFY2024
  9. 0FY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for PARTEK, INCORPORATED in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

11 companies · $24.1M reported

  1. LAUREL, MD · 14 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. DOVER, DE · 4 subawards
  3. FORT DETRICK, MD · 30 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 78 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BRUKER BIOSPIN CORP$59.9M−12% in FY2026
    BILLERICA, MA · 6 entities · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNational Institutes of Health · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenanceNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+12 more
  2. UPLAND, CA · 25% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingAgricultural Research Service · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+8 more
  3. CARL ZEISS MICROSCOPY, LLC$32.3M+58% in FY2026
    WHITE PLAINS, NY · 2 entities · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNational Institutes of Health · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenanceArmy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+8 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of ILLUMINA, INC. (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • ILLUMINA, INC.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$1.7M
24 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$7.3M
$7.3M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$3.6M
    41 reports
  2. 2024$1.3M
    29 reports
  3. 2025$1.7M
    24 reports
  4. 2026$620K
    11 reports

Top issues

  1. Health issues74 reports
  2. Trade (domestic and foreign)29 reports
  3. Defense16 reports
  4. Budget and appropriations12 reports
  5. Government issues12 reports
  6. Homeland security8 reports
  7. Medicare and Medicaid8 reports
  8. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code5 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE83 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES82 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Sidley Austin LLP$1.3M
    8 reports
  2. Avenue Solutions$840K
    14 reports
  3. Todd Strategy Group$760K
    12 reports
  4. DLA Piper LLP (US)$440K
    6 reports
  5. Miller Strategies, LLC$390K
    5 reports
  6. Farragut Partners LLP$330K
    8 reports
  7. S-3 Group$220K
    5 reports
  8. JEFFREY J. KIMBELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.$206.3K
    11 reports

15 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.