Federal contractor · MEDFORD, NJ

PATCHPLUS CONSULTING INC

PATCHPLUS CONSULTING INC received $5.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−20% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $69.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($3.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$5.9M
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
53%
UEI
USELLU6R1T66
Small businessWoman-ownedVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5.7MFY2017
  2. 1.3MFY2018
  3. 5.7MFY2019
  4. 6.1MFY2020
  5. 8.7MFY2021
  6. 8.2MFY2022
  7. 11.9MFY2023
  8. 8.7MFY2024
  9. 7.3MFY2025
  10. 5.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$3.7M64%
    3 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$2.1M36%
    2 awards
  3. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$2.1M36%
  2. Education & social services$2.1M36%
  3. Research & development$1.7M28%

Where the work was performed

  1. Burlington County, NJ$2.2M37%
  2. Allegheny County, PA$1.6M26%
  3. El Paso County, CO$1.1M19%
  4. St. Clair County, IL$998.3K17%
  5. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition53%
    US 39% · $3.1M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions53%
    US 8.8% · $3.1M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. TECHNICAL EXPERTISE AND FUNCTIONAL SUPPORT TO THE MISRWS IN THE PLANNING, DRAFTING, AND IMPLEMENTATION OF TRAINING CURRICULUMS AND GUIDES...$7.6M
    Department of the Navy· Burlington County, NJ· Education & social services· Sep 14, 2023 – Jun 5, 2026· N0024423F3013
  2. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL/DECISION SUPPORT$4M
    Department of the Air Force· El Paso County, CO· Professional services· Jul 13, 2023 – Jan 12, 2026· FA251823F0023
  3. HEADQUARTERS (HQ) AIR MOBILITY COMMAND (AMC) DIRECTORATE OF OPERATIONS (A3) JOINT EXERCISE DIVISION (A37) REQUIRES SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTISE TO PROVIDE OPERATIONAL, FUNCTIONAL, AND SYSTEMS SUPPORT.$2.6M
    Department of the Air Force· St. Clair County, IL· Professional services· Sep 30, 2024 – Jun 3, 2026· FA445224F0060
  4. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT$1.6M
    Department of the Navy· Allegheny County, PA· Research & development· May 28, 2026 – May 28, 2026· N6833526C0257
  5. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT$240K
    Department of the Navy· Burlington County, NJ· Research & development· May 12, 2025 – Feb 2, 2026· N6833525C0412
  6. SCALABLE HOMELAND INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISE LAYERED DEFENSE (SHIELD) INITIAL ORDER.$500
    Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· HQ085926FF387

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $357K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. KRATOS S2, INC$357K100%
    COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $5.8M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $7M received
  • FY2023: $3.5M paid out · $2.9M received
  • FY2024: $56.7K paid out · $7.6M received
  • FY2025: $47.8K paid out · $8.1M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $357K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

7 companies · $3.6M reported

  1. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC$1.2M
    MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. SAWDEY SOLUTION SERVICES INC$1.2M
    BEAVERCREEK, OH · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. COBALT TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC$404K
    SOUTH HADLEY, MA · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes that pay it

17 companies · $31.7M reported

  1. OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC$7.8M
    BURLINGTON, MA · 12 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. KRATOS S2, INC$5.8M
    COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 15 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP$3.8M
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 5 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SOLUTIONS THROUGH INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC$19.6M−28% in FY2026
    FAIRBORN, OH · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. AUSTIN BROCKENBROUGH & ASSOCIATES LLC$12.9M−87% in FY2026
    RICHMOND, VA · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. QWALTEC INC$15.1M+55% in FY2026
    TEMPE, AZ · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.