Federal contractor · SEASIDE, OR
PATRICK CHASTAIN
PATRICK CHASTAIN received $783K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+177% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.8M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($783K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $783K
- New awards
- 5
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- JU4SDY31T549
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 45.3KFY2017
- 451.2KFY2018
- 503.4KFY2019
- 519.9KFY2020
- 161.1KFY2021
- 612.8KFY2022
- 289.1KFY2023
- 102.8KFY2024
- 282.4KFY2025
- 783KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Bureau of Land Management$783K100%5 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$783K100%
Where the work was performed
- Marion County, OR$530.6K68%
- Jackson County, OR$301.5K39%
- Clatsop County, OR$71.6K9.1%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · -$122.8K
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · -$122.8K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Bureau of Land Management· Marion County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Jun 25, 2026 – Jun 25, 2026· 140L4326F0062
- FY26 STAND EXAMS, MEDFORD$303.6KBureau of Land Management· Jackson County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Feb 25, 2026 – Feb 25, 2026· 140L4326F0006
- FY25 STAND EXAMS$142.7KBureau of Land Management· Jackson County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Mar 21, 2025 – Sep 21, 2026· 140L4325F0004
- Bureau of Land Management· Clatsop County, OR· Facilities & utilities· Sep 10, 2026 – Sep 10, 2026· 140L4326F0155
- Bureau of Land Management· Arapahoe County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Apr 15, 2025 – Jun 18, 2026· 140L4325F0038
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- RANGELANDS RESTORATION SERVICES LLC$1.3M+522% in FY2026PIOCHE, NV · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestryForest Service · Support activities for forestry
- RAZR BAK RESTORATION, LLC$1.2M+94% in FY2026AURORA, UT · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestryForest Service · Support activities for forestry
- ROCKY MOUNTAIN ECOLOGY LLC$1M+127% in FY2026LOS RANCHOS, NM · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestryForest Service · Support activities for forestry
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.