Federal contractor · AURORA, UT

RAZR BAK RESTORATION, LLC

RAZR BAK RESTORATION, LLC received $603.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 9 awards (+94% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $1.3M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($420.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$603.9K
New awards
9
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
70%
UEI
QTUMMNLFPMQ9
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 45.8KFY2023
  2. 333.6KFY2024
  3. 311KFY2025
  4. 603.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$420.9K70%
    6 awards
  2. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$603.9K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition70%
    US 39% · $420.9K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions70%
    US 8.7% · $420.9K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Land Management· Mohave County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Dec 23, 2024 – Feb 25, 2026· 140L6425P0002
  2. Forest Service· Sevier County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Jul 25, 2026 – Sep 10, 2026· 1202SB26M1874
  3. Bureau of Land Management· Moffat County, CO· Facilities & utilities· May 5, 2026 – May 5, 2026· 140L3726P0036
  4. Bureau of Land Management· Moffat County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Apr 6, 2026 – Apr 6, 2026· 140L3726P0023
  5. Forest Service· Sevier County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Sep 14, 2026 – Sep 14, 2026· 12024B26M1704
  6. Forest Service· Washoe County, NV· Facilities & utilities· Aug 4, 2026 – Aug 4, 2026· 1202SB26M2101
  7. Forest Service· La Plata County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jul 15, 2026 – Sep 27, 2026· 1202SB26M1543
  8. Forest Service· Sevier County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 13, 2026 – Aug 13, 2026· 12024B26M0802

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PIOCHE, NV · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestryForest Service · Support activities for forestry
  2. PATRICK CHASTAIN$1.2M+177% in FY2026
    SEASIDE, OR · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestryForest Service · Support activities for forestry
  3. BUSCHER ENGINES, INC$1.1M−80% in FY2026
    SHERIDAN, OR · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestryForest Service · Support activities for forestry

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.