Federal contractor · HERNDON, VA

PERATON INC.

No contract obligations recorded for PERATON INC. in FY2026. Since FY2017: $455.7M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
N3RSDM1LXKK9
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC company family: 60 registered entities, $4.1B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLCCHANTILLY, VA · Family page
    $699.5M
  2. PERATON INC.HERNDON, VA
    $2.1B
  3. GUIDEHOUSE INC.MC LEAN, VA
    $704.6M
  4. GUIDEHOUSE LLPMCLEAN, VA
    $155.8M
  5. PERATON TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INC.CHANTILLY, VA
    $150.6M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 169.9MFY2017
  2. 175.8MFY2018
  3. 117.9MFY2019
  4. -6.9MFY2020
  5. 11.1KFY2021
  6. -7KFY2022
  7. -28KFY2023
  8. -907.4KFY2024
  9. -64KFY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for PERATON INC. in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $582.9K (2 subawards)

2 primes

  1. KRATOS TECHNOLOGY & TRAINING SOLUTIONS, INC.$382.9K66%
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 1 subaward
  2. GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.$200K34%
    FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.3M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $2.7M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $24.9M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $7M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $12.9M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $582.9K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2,076 companies · $11.6B reported

  1. WESTWIND COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC.$904.1M
    ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 125 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. KAMBRIAN CORPORATION$843M
    LA PUENTE, CA · 83 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$609.4M
    MELBOURNE, FL · 43 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

123 companies · $3.2B reported

  1. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$1.3B
    MELBOURNE, FL · 216 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$347M
    RESTON, VA · 82 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$244M
    PASADENA, CA · 1 subaward

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 224 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP$11.2B−5.6% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 8 entities · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related servicesArmy · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services+15 more
  2. CACI, INC. - FEDERAL$13.2B−26% in FY2026
    CHANTILLY, VA · 67 entities · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services+6 more
  3. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$13.3B−22% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 31 entities · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesState · Computer systems design and related services+9 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC (60 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Chromalloy Gas Turbine, LLCAI match · 100%
  • CHROMALLOY CORPORATION/CHROMALLOY GAS TURBINE LLCAI match · 99%
  • PERATON CORP.AI match · 99%
  • THE GUIDEHOUSE INC.AI match · 98%
  • APTIM CORP.AI match · 92%
Lobbying · 2025
$800K
28 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.3M
$2.3M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$412.5K
4 PACs

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$630K
    14 reports
  2. 2024$380K
    18 reports
  3. 2025$800K
    28 reports
  4. 2026$470K
    14 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense47 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations30 reports
  3. Intelligence and surveillance25 reports
  4. Transportation23 reports
  5. Homeland security20 reports
  6. Aviation, aircraft and airlines16 reports
  7. Government issues16 reports
  8. Computer industry14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES73 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE72 reports
  3. Homeland Security - Dept of (DHS)14 reports
  4. Transportation - Dept of (DOT)12 reports
  5. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)9 reports
  6. Treasury - Dept of8 reports
  7. White House Office8 reports
  8. General Services Administration (GSA)6 reports
  9. Interior - Dept of (DOI)3 reports
  10. Internal Revenue Service (IRS)3 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$2.2M
    26 reports
  2. Monument Advocacy$480K
    14 reports
  3. THE VOGEL GROUP$350K
    6 reports
  4. Cassidy & Associates, Inc.$190K
    7 reports
  5. INNOVATIVE FEDERAL STRATEGIES, LLC$170K
    7 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$269K65%
  2. Democratic$143.5K35%

PACs sponsored

  • PERATON CORP. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (A.K.A. 'PERATON PAC')$262.6K raised this cycle
  • THE GUIDEHOUSE INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (GUIDEHOUSE PAC)$89K raised this cycle
  • CHROMALLOY CORPORATION/CHROMALLOY GAS TURBINE LLC PAC (CHROMALLOY PAC)$0 raised this cycle
  • APTIM CORP. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AKA APTIM PAC)$0 raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.