Federal contractor · ESSINGTON, PA

PIASECKI AIRCRAFT CORP

No contract obligations recorded for PIASECKI AIRCRAFT CORP in FY2026. Since FY2017: $74.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
E11VKLMGHB65
Parent company
PIASECKI AIRCRAFT CORP
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.9MFY2017
  2. 5.5MFY2018
  3. 9.1MFY2019
  4. 9.3MFY2020
  5. 13.6MFY2021
  6. 12.2MFY2022
  7. 9.4MFY2023
  8. 7.9MFY2024
  9. 2.8MFY2025
  10. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Delaware County, PA· Research & development· Feb 28, 2017 – Dec 1, 2025· 0001

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

PIASECKI AIRCRAFT CORP received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 3 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
3
Since FY2023
$1.3M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 199.9KFY2023
  2. 1.1MFY2024
  3. 0FY2026

Largest awards

  1. 81.049 · Office of Science Financial Assistance Program· Department of Energy· Project grant· Aug 3, 2023 – Jul 23, 2026· DESC0023929

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2023–FY2026.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LOS ANGELES, CA · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Scientific research and development services
  2. ROCKVILLE, MD · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  3. WAPSI VALLEY ARCHAEOLOGY, INC.$5.7M−66% in FY2026
    ANAMOSA, IA · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Piasecki Aircraft Corp.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$160K
12 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$380K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$80K
    6 reports
  2. 2024$80K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$160K
    12 reports
  4. 2026$60K
    5 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense24 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations19 reports
  3. Aerospace16 reports
  4. Aviation, aircraft and airlines10 reports
  5. Small business5 reports
  6. Energy and nuclear2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES31 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE31 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. CT Group fka CTF GLOBAL LLC$280K
    14 reports
  2. ELEVATE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC$100K
    5 reports
  3. Robison International, Inc.$0
    11 reports
  4. RIDGELINE ADVOCACY GROUP LLC$0
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.