Federal contractor · SUNRISE, FL

PIXELS ON TARGET LLC

PIXELS ON TARGET LLC received $4.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−69% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $19.3M. Its largest customer was U.S. Special Operations Command ($4.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$4.5M
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
D5MJK2BJX793
Parent company
PIXELS ON TARGET LLC
Small businessMinority-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 135.3KFY2023
  2. 165KFY2024
  3. 14.5MFY2025
  4. 4.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. U.S. Special Operations Command$4.2M95%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$231.8K5.2%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$4.2M95%
  2. Research & development$230.8K5.2%
  3. Equipment maintenance$1,0180.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Broward County, FL$4.5M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $1,018
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $1,018
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Navy$1,018
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. MAS-N$4.2M
    U.S. Special Operations Command· Broward County, FL· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 26, 2026 – Mar 26, 2026· H9240326FE036
  2. THIS IS AN AWARD OF A BASE CONTRACT UNDER SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM TOPIC 25.1-005.$231.7K
    Department of the Navy· Broward County, FL· Research & development· Jun 18, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· M6785425C6540
  3. THIS ACTION IS FOR AWARD OF A CONTRACT FOR SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH UNDER 25.2 TOPIC 078$136.6K
    Department of the Navy· Broward County, FL· Research & development· Dec 18, 2025 – Jun 11, 2026· M6785426C6565
  4. EVALUATION TEST, TEARDOWN AND EVALUATION FOR DELIVERY ORDER ON 23DS003$1,018
    Department of the Navy· Broward County, FL· Equipment maintenance· May 14, 2026 – May 14, 2026· N0016426FL078

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $243.9K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $2.2M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $2.5M reported

  1. ATLANTIC DIVING SUPPLY, INC.$1.7M
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 4 subawards · Other miscellaneous manufacturing
  2. MANTECH TSG-2 JOINT VENTURE$784.4K
    FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. POINT ROCK SOLUTIONS, LLC$15.5M−71% in FY2026
    LEESBURG, VA · 73% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Special Operations Command · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing
  2. ENVISION TECHNOLOGY, LLC$139.6M+19% in FY2026
    MANCHESTER, NH · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Special Operations Command · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturingNavy · Scientific research and development servicesU.S. Special Operations Command · Scientific research and development services
  3. NVTS NIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.$3.4M−100% in FY2026
    NORTH KINGSTOWN, RI · 8.4% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturingArmy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Pixels on TargetAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$190K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2024–2026
$350K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2024$60K
    2 reports
  2. 2025$190K
    4 reports
  3. 2026$100K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense8 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES8 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE6 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)4 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$350K
    8 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.