Federal contractor · HOLLYWOOD, MD

PLATFORM SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED

PLATFORM SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED received $12M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−67% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $75.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($12M). It also received $2M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$12M
New awards
4
Sole-source
92%
Single offer
8.2%
UEI
L11HMGGGWD46
Parent company
SABRE SYSTEMS, INC.
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the SABRE SYSTEMS, LLC company family: 2 registered entities, $44.1M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. SABRE SYSTEMS, LLCLEXINGTON PARK, MD · Family page
    $32.1M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 695.7KFY2017
  2. 749.5KFY2018
  3. 6.9MFY2019
  4. 1.9MFY2020
  5. 1.8MFY2021
  6. 6.5MFY2022
  7. 6.8MFY2023
  8. 1.5MFY2024
  9. 36.4MFY2025
  10. 12MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$10.7M89%
  2. Research & development$1.3M11%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $12M
  • Sole-source awards92%
    US 30% · $11M
  • Single-offer competitions8.2%
    US 8.8% · $976K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· St. Mary's County, MD· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Aug 25, 2025 – Apr 15, 2026· N0016425FJ608
  2. Department of the Navy· St. Mary's County, MD· Research & development· Jan 22, 2025 – May 26, 2026· N6833525F0008
  3. Department of the Navy· St. Mary's County, MD· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 2, 2025 – Dec 29, 2025· N0016425FJ051
  4. Department of the Navy· Martin County, IN· Research & development· Jun 1, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· N0016426FJ036

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

PLATFORM SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED received $2M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 2 actions (0 new awards), +700% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 12.300 · Basic and Applied Scientific Research ($2M).

Assistance · FY2026
$2M
New awards
0
Actions
2
Since FY2024
$2.5M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 243.8KFY2024
  2. 250KFY2025
  3. 2MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$2M100%

Top programs

  1. 12.300 · Basic and Applied Scientific Research$2M100%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Defense

Largest awards

  1. METOC$2.5M
    12.300 · Basic and Applied Scientific Research· Department of the Navy· Project grant· Aug 9, 2024 – Aug 11, 2026· N000142412709

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $555K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $2.9M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.9M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.6M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $149.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

24 companies · $7.4M reported

  1. SAN DIEGO, CA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  2. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. VETERAN CORP$813.6K
    ALDIE, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

20 companies · $69.2M reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 24 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. WARNER ROBINS, GA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 12 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. UPPER MARLBORO, MD · 2 entities · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingNavy · Scientific research and development services
  2. C4 PLANNING SOLUTIONS, LLC$69.8M−7.7% in FY2026
    BLYTHE, GA · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$75M−100% in FY2026
    COLUMBIA, MD · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of SABRE SYSTEMS, LLC (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Platform Systems Incorporated dba Platform AerospaceAI match · 95%
Lobbying · 2025
$100K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$310K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$100K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$100K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$100K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$10K
    1 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations13 reports
  2. Defense13 reports
  3. Homeland security4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES9 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE9 reports
  3. U.S. Marines4 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Van Scoyoc Associates$310K
    13 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.