Federal contractor · PETALUMA, CA

POINT REYES BIRD OBSERVATORY

POINT REYES BIRD OBSERVATORY received $15K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−81% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.4M. Its largest customer was U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ($15K). It also received $2.9M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$15K
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
LMCTPLQMR1F5
Other than small businessNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 109.5KFY2017
  2. 217KFY2018
  3. 219.1KFY2019
  4. 129.7KFY2020
  5. 195.6KFY2021
  6. 325.7KFY2022
  7. 62.4KFY2023
  8. 38.3KFY2024
  9. 80.2KFY2025
  10. 15KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$15K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $15K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $15K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Interior · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Land Management· San Bernardino County, CA· Professional services· May 1, 2025 – Mar 30, 2026· 140L1225P0028
  2. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Alameda County, CA· Professional services· Sep 22, 2026 – Sep 22, 2026· 140FS126P0220

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

POINT REYES BIRD OBSERVATORY received $2.9M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 17 actions (2 new awards), +5.6% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 47.078 · Polar Programs ($1.2M).

Assistance · FY2026
$2.9M
New awards
2
Actions
17
Since FY2021
$19.5M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 3.1MFY2021
  2. 2.7MFY2022
  3. 5.6MFY2023
  4. 2.6MFY2024
  5. 2.7MFY2025
  6. 2.9MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$2.9M100%

Top programs

  1. 47.078 · Polar Programs$1.2M41%
  2. 15.637 · Migratory Bird Joint Ventures$987.1K34%
  3. 12.632 · Department of War Energy, Installations, and Environment Innovation Programs$311.9K11%
  4. 15.944 · Natural Resource Stewardship$169K5.9%
  5. 43.001 · Science$98.6K3.4%
  6. 15.631 · Partners for Fish and Wildlife$49.9K1.7%
  7. 15.664 · Fish and Wildlife Coordination and Assistance$49.5K1.7%
  8. 10.684 · International Forestry Programs$36K1.3%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of the Interior
  2. Department of Defense
  3. Department of the Interior
  4. Department of Agriculture

Largest awards

  1. 47.078 · Polar Programs· National Science Foundation· Project grant· Oct 7, 2020 – Feb 26, 2026· 1935870
  2. 12.632 · Department of War Energy, Installations, and Environment Innovation Programs· Washington Headquarters Services· Cooperative agreement· Jul 2, 2021 – Aug 6, 2026· HQ00342120009
  3. 15.637 · Migratory Bird Joint Ventures· U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Cooperative agreement· Mar 21, 2023 – Jul 23, 2026· F23AC00657
  4. 47.078 · Polar Programs· National Science Foundation· Project grant· Aug 11, 2026 – Aug 11, 2026· 2535120
  5. 12.632 · Department of War Energy, Installations, and Environment Innovation Programs· Washington Headquarters Services· Cooperative agreement· Sep 21, 2026 – Sep 21, 2026· HQ0034262E014
  6. 43.001 · Science· National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Project grant· Jan 13, 2025 – Mar 5, 2026· 80NSSC25K7243

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $81.2K (2 subawards)

1 prime

  1. MOSS LANDING, CA · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $488.5K received
  • FY2022: $255K paid out · $266.3K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $4M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $189K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $161.2K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $81.2K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $255K reported

  1. MERCED, CA · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

10 companies · $5.2M reported

  1. WOLFE'S NECK FARM FOUNDATION, INC THE$3.8M
    FREEPORT, ME · 1 subaward
  2. SAN FRANCISCO, CA · 2 subawards
  3. MOSS LANDING, CA · 8 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GARDEN CITY, ID · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. HOUSTON, TX · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. CORRALES, NM · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.