Federal contractor · ARLINGTON, VA

PRAXIS, INC.

No contract obligations recorded for PRAXIS, INC. in FY2026. Since FY2017: $154.4M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
CDQDN5ZC6MK1
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the TECHNOLOGY SERVICE CORP company family: 6 registered entities, $76.4M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. TECHNOLOGY SERVICE CORPARLINGTON, VA · Family page
    $76.4M
  2. MAGNACOM INC.HUNTSVILLE, AL
    $0
  3. $0
  4. $0
  5. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 34.9MFY2017
  2. 33.8MFY2018
  3. 29.1MFY2019
  4. 27.6MFY2020
  5. 21.5MFY2021
  6. 6.8MFY2022
  7. 621.9KFY2023
  8. -16.9KFY2024

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for PRAXIS, INC. in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

PRAXIS, INC. received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. -436FY2022

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2022.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $845.7K paid out · $140K received
  • FY2022: $239.2K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

57 companies · $77.1M reported

  1. SOLANA BEACH, CA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. TITAN ECHELON LLC$7M
    SOUTHERN PINES, NC · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. AGAT, GU · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

27 companies · $387.3M reported

  1. TUCSON, AZ · 49 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 55 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. CENTREVILLE, VA · 6 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 12 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ENVISIONEERING INC$145.7M−42% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. CALIFORNIA, MD · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. CASTELION CORPORATION$257.1M+201% in FY2026
    TORRANCE, CA · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of TECHNOLOGY SERVICE CORP (6 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Technology Service CorporationAI match · 98%
Lobbying · 2025
$120K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$420K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$150K
    11 reports
  2. 2024$110K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$120K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$40K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations28 reports
  2. Defense28 reports
  3. Small business21 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES28 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE28 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. RESTON STRATEGY GROUP, LLC$240K
    14 reports
  2. 535 GROUP, LLC$140K
    14 reports
  3. Meeks, Butera & Israel PLLC$40K
    2 reports
  4. Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP$0
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.