Federal contractor · ENGLEWOOD, CO

PREMIER DATA SERVICES INC

PREMIER DATA SERVICES INC received $1.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (+61% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $39.7M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($1.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.6M
New awards
10
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
UUCAHK878L99
Parent company
S&P GLOBAL INC.
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

7 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $8.4M in FY2026 together.

  1. PREMIER DATA SERVICES INCENGLEWOOD, CO · Family page
    $1.6M
  2. S&P GLOBAL INC.NEW YORK, NY
    $4.5M
  3. $1.8M
  4. $294.9K
  5. $151.8K
  6. $0
  7. PANJIVA, INCNEW YORK, NY
    -$12K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 6MFY2017
  2. 4MFY2018
  3. 4.2MFY2019
  4. 6.6MFY2020
  5. 4.2MFY2021
  6. 5.3MFY2022
  7. 5.2MFY2023
  8. 1.8MFY2024
  9. 979.4KFY2025
  10. 1.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 10 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$1.6M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Ada County, ID$99.6K6.3%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Land Management· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Sep 25, 2025 – Sep 24, 2026· 140L0125F0108
  2. Bureau of Land Management· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 24, 2026 – Sep 24, 2026· 140L0626F0064
  3. Bureau of Land Management· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 23, 2026 – Sep 23, 2026· 140L0626F0063
  4. Bureau of Land Management· Arapahoe County, CO· Professional services· May 12, 2026 – May 12, 2026· 140L0626F0028
  5. Bureau of Land Management· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Professional services· Sep 11, 2026 – Sep 11, 2026· 140L0626F0056
  6. Bureau of Land Management· Arapahoe County, CO· Professional services· May 12, 2026 – May 12, 2026· 140L0626F0030
  7. Bureau of Land Management· Ada County, ID· Professional services· Sep 2, 2026 – Sep 2, 2026· 140L0626F0049
  8. Bureau of Land Management· Arapahoe County, CO· Professional services· Sep 23, 2025 – May 11, 2026· 140L0625F0158

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $915K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $3.5M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $257K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $1.2M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

3 companies · $5.9M reported

  1. KAPALA IT LLC$4.5M
    PORTLAND, OR · 13 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. LAKEWOOD, CO · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. POTOMAC FALLS, VA · 6 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $484.1K reported

  1. MC LEAN, VA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. ALEXANDRIA, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  3. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 37 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MANAGED BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC$14.5M−140% in FY2026
    COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Computer systems design and related services
  2. 3T-INNOVATIONS, LLC$7.7M+103% in FY2026
    TAMPA, FL · 12% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Computer systems design and related services
  3. AXXIS SOFTWARE LLC$1.8M+3% in FY2026
    GAITHERSBURG, MD · 7.9% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Newspaper, periodical, book, and directory publishers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of PREMIER DATA SERVICES INC (7 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • S&P GLOBAL INC.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$805K
16 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$3.1M
PAC giving · 2026
$62.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$940K
    16 reports
  2. 2024$940K
    16 reports
  3. 2025$805K
    16 reports
  4. 2026$420K
    8 reports

Top issues

  1. Financial institutions, investments and securities50 reports
  2. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code19 reports
  3. Transportation14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES50 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE45 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. S-3 Group$980K
    14 reports
  2. Sternhell Group$840K
    14 reports
  3. BGR Government Affairs$480K
    14 reports
  4. Emergent Strategies$405K
    9 reports
  5. Harbinger Strategies, LLC$400K
    5 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Democratic$37K59%
  2. Republican$25.5K41%

PACs sponsored

  • S&P GLOBAL INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$184.3K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.