Federal contractor · COLORADO SPRINGS, CO

MANAGED BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC

MANAGED BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC received -$2.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (−140% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $120.6M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($929K).

Obligations · FY2026
-$2.3M
New awards
10
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
XV3NLKL4UFA9
Small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 18.5MFY2017
  2. 16.5MFY2018
  3. 15.1MFY2019
  4. 16.8MFY2020
  5. 17MFY2021
  6. 10.7MFY2022
  7. 11.5MFY2023
  8. 11.2MFY2024
  9. 5.6MFY2025
  10. -2.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$1.1M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Interior · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Jefferson County, CO· Professional services· Jul 27, 2020 – May 6, 2026· 140A1620C0007
  2. Bureau of Land Management· Jefferson County, CO· IT & telecom· Mar 30, 2021 – Jun 23, 2026· 140L0621F0092
  3. Bureau of Land Management· Jefferson County, CO· IT & telecom· Nov 12, 2021 – Jun 23, 2026· 140L0622F0019
  4. Bureau of Land Management· Jefferson County, CO· IT & telecom· Jul 20, 2022 – Dec 2, 2025· 140L0622F0117
  5. Bureau of Land Management· Jefferson County, CO· IT & telecom· Aug 23, 2021 – Jul 30, 2026· 140L0621F0253
  6. Bureau of Land Management· Jefferson County, CO· IT & telecom· Aug 28, 2025 – Jul 30, 2026· 140L0625F0111
  7. National Park Service· Jefferson County, CO· IT & telecom· Aug 16, 2022 – Mar 16, 2026· 140P2022F0272
  8. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· El Paso County, CO· Professional services· Jan 13, 2026 – Mar 13, 2026· 140A1626P0010

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $351.5K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $735.4K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $3M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $4.4M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $8.7M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $351.5K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $17.3M reported

  1. ARLINGTON, VA · 28 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. FAIRFIELD, NJ · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ECODATA ANALYTICS LLC$11M+1,168% in FY2026
    SEATTLE, WA · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesNational Park Service · Computer systems design and related services
  2. COOPER ZIETZ ENGINEERS, INC.$8.1M−49% in FY2026
    PORTLAND, OR · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. DAVENPORT, IA · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.