Federal contractor · DOHA

PRIME VERITAS GENERAL TRADING & CONTRACTING

PRIME VERITAS GENERAL TRADING & CONTRACTING received $2.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 17 awards (−77% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $32.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($1.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.4M
New awards
17
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
RJHMMJN6ANC3
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.5MFY2020
  2. 5.5MFY2021
  3. 4.3MFY2022
  4. 2.7MFY2023
  5. 3.6MFY2024
  6. 10.5MFY2025
  7. 2.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 14 awards
  2. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$1.4M59%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$649.9K27%
  3. Equipment maintenance$186K7.8%
  4. Facilities & utilities$153.6K6.4%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$2.4M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Jul 15, 2025 – May 13, 2026· W519TC25CA009
  2. Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Sep 19, 2025 – Apr 4, 2026· FA491125F0058
  3. Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2024 – Apr 10, 2026· FA491124C0005
  4. Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Sep 12, 2023 – Nov 10, 2025· FA491123C0029
  5. Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Oct 7, 2024 – May 24, 2026· FA491125P0003
  6. Department of the Air Force· Equipment maintenance· Dec 1, 2021 – Nov 19, 2025· FA570222P0005
  7. Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Sep 16, 2024 – Feb 14, 2026· FA491124C0002
  8. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Aug 12, 2025 – Feb 12, 2026· W519TC25CA023

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.2M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $3.3M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $3M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $211K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $7.7M reported

  1. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 19 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. GREENVILLE, TX · 1 subaward · Communications equipment manufacturing

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 20 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MATAI SERVICES, LLC$8M+0.5% in FY2026
    KANSAS CITY, MO · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionAir Force · Nonresidential building constructionAir Force · Foundation, structure, and building exterior contractors
  2. PINEWOOD INC.$10M−99% in FY2026
    GWANGJU-SI, KOR · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionAir Force · Utility system construction
  3. CMB SERVICES, INC.$6.2M−79% in FY2026
    COLUMBIA, SC · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionAir Force · Building equipment contractorsAir Force · Foundation, structure, and building exterior contractors

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.