Federal contractor · BELTSVILLE, MD

PRITCHETT CONTROLS, INC.

PRITCHETT CONTROLS, INC. received $1.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+19% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $9.7M. Its largest customer was Defense Information Systems Agency ($470.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.1M
New awards
5
Sole-source
56%
Single offer
44%
UEI
CMFCT2ZGZKR1
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 714.4KFY2017
  2. 1.2MFY2018
  3. 1.3MFY2019
  4. 736.7KFY2020
  5. 672.5KFY2021
  6. 845.4KFY2022
  7. 1.1MFY2023
  8. 1.2MFY2024
  9. 907.1KFY2025
  10. 1.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$470.9K44%
  2. Equipment maintenance$354.8K33%
  3. Professional services$231.7K21%
  4. Other equipment & supplies$20.4K1.9%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.1M
  • Sole-source awards56%
    US 30% · $606.9K
  • Single-offer competitions44%
    US 8.7% · $470.9K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of State · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Defense Information Systems Agency· Anne Arundel County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Oct 30, 2020 – Feb 17, 2026· HC104721P4000
  2. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences· Montgomery County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Apr 5, 2024 – Feb 25, 2026· HU000124P0020
  3. Immediate Office of the Secretary of Transportation· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 5, 2023 – Jul 17, 2026· 693JK423C500007
  4. Defense Information Systems Agency· Anne Arundel County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Apr 29, 2026 – May 1, 2026· HC104726P4001
  5. Department of State· Prince George's County, MD· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 21, 2026 – Jul 21, 2026· 19RS5026P0286

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $51.6K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $5.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $5.1M reported

  1. FRAMINGHAM, MA · 1 subaward
  2. ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DAYTON GROUP INC$8.2M+94% in FY2026
    CATONSVILLE, MD · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Facilities support services
  2. RESTON, VA · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Facilities support services
  3. BEACON GROUP, INC.$18.8M−48% in FY2026
    TUCSON, AZ · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 15 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.