Federal contractor · ARLINGTON, VA

PRIVATE TECH INC.

PRIVATE TECH INC. received $3.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−58% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $11.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($1.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.2M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
53%
UEI
U42VNM49XD15
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1MFY2023
  2. 73.8KFY2024
  3. 7.6MFY2025
  4. 3.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$3.1M98%
  2. IT & telecom$78K2.5%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition53%
    US 39% · $1.7M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions53%
    US 8.8% · $1.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, AL· Research & development· Sep 29, 2025 – Apr 10, 2026· FA877125C0006
  2. Departmental Offices· District of Columbia, DC· Research & development· Feb 4, 2026 – Sep 24, 2026· 140D0426C0035
  3. Department of the Army· Arlington County, VA· IT & telecom· Dec 9, 2025 – Jan 14, 2026· W50S9C26FA001

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $175K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $340K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $515K reported

  1. MCLEAN, VA · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. WOBURN, MA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KAHILI VENTURES, LLC$8.9M−100% in FY2026
    LINCOLN, NE · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  2. DATUM SOFTWARE, INC.$9.6M−100% in FY2026
    JOHNS CREEK, GA · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  3. ELEKS, INC$9.8M+51% in FY2026
    LAS VEGAS, NV · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Private Tech Inc.AI match · 98%
Lobbying · 2025
$260K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$720K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$100K
    6 reports
  2. 2024$200K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$260K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$160K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense16 reports
  2. Telecommunications2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES16 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE16 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. MZ Advising, LLC$700K
    13 reports
  2. J.A. Green and Company (formerly LLC)$20K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.