Federal contractor · MISSION VIEJO, CA

PRO-PIPE, INC.

PRO-PIPE, INC. received $56K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards. Since FY2020: $80.4K. Its largest customer was National Park Service ($80.4K).

Obligations · FY2026
$56K
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
JNZKJSQBLZ16
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $56K in FY2026 together.

  1. PRO-PIPE, INC.MISSION VIEJO, CA · Family page
    $56K
  2. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 24.5KFY2020
  2. 56KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$80.4K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $56K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $56K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications100%
    US 5.1% · $80.4K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Interior · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. National Park Service· Yavapai County, AZ· Equipment maintenance· Jan 29, 2026 – Mar 23, 2026· 140P1526P0005
  2. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Pima County, AZ· Construction & real property· Apr 16, 2020 – Sep 23, 2026· 140A1120P0043

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $36.7K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.8M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · -$413.5K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $1.4M reported

  1. CHANTILLY, VA · 6 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ENGLEWOOD, CO · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. WOODFORD, VA · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Water, sewage and other systems
  2. RIVERCREST CONSTRUCTION$64.5K−100% in FY2026
    ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Water, sewage and other systems
  3. WESTERN TANK SERVICES LLC$71.9K−100% in FY2026
    GLENDALE, AZ · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Water, sewage and other systems

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.