Federal contractor · MONROE, MI

PRUDENTIAL PROTECTIVE SERVICES LLC

PRUDENTIAL PROTECTIVE SERVICES LLC received $5.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−51% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $70.8M. Its largest customer was U.S. Marshals Service ($2.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$5.8M
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
49%
UEI
GFD5CHYBGTH5
Parent company
PRUDENTIAL PROTECTIVE SERVICES, LLC
Small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 308.2KFY2017
  2. 287.3KFY2018
  3. 2.1MFY2019
  4. 8.6MFY2020
  5. 14MFY2021
  6. 5.6MFY2022
  7. 9.5MFY2023
  8. 12.8MFY2024
  9. 11.8MFY2025
  10. 5.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$5.8M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition49%
    US 39% · $2.8M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions49%
    US 8.8% · $2.8M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Marshals Service· Monroe County, MI· Facilities & utilities· May 16, 2025 – Sep 3, 2026· 15M40025FA3500023
  2. U.S. Census Bureau· Monroe County, MI· Facilities & utilities· Jun 26, 2024 – Jul 28, 2026· 1333LC24F00000149
  3. Federal Acquisition Service· Arlington County, VA· Professional services· Aug 23, 2021 – Jul 10, 2026· 47QFWA21F0028
  4. Federal Acquisition Service· Arlington County, VA· Professional services· Nov 29, 2022 – Jul 10, 2026· 47QFWA23F0003
  5. Federal Emergency Management Agency· Eaton County, MI· Facilities & utilities· Aug 12, 2026 – Sep 21, 2026· 70FBR526C00000002

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DIAMOND BAR, CA · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Marshals Service · Investigation and security servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Investigation and security services
  2. UNITED SECURITY INC$56.4M+3.6% in FY2026
    RED BANK, NJ · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Marshals Service · Investigation and security servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Investigation and security services
  3. VERSAR, INC.$60M−13% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 3 entities · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Marshals Service · Investigation and security services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.