Federal contractor · PHOENIX, AZ

PUEBLO MECHANICAL AND CONTROLS, LLC

PUEBLO MECHANICAL AND CONTROLS, LLC received $69.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards. Since FY2017: $1.2M. Its largest customer was Agricultural Research Service ($53.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$69.2K
New awards
4
Sole-source
43%
Single offer
57%
UEI
VXKMEVBJBBC7
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 8KFY2017
  2. 196.5KFY2018
  3. 167.7KFY2019
  4. 103KFY2020
  5. 63.5KFY2021
  6. 107.6KFY2022
  7. 385.5KFY2023
  8. 148.7KFY2024
  9. -35.6KFY2025
  10. 69.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$62.5K90%
  2. Facilities & utilities$6,6079.6%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $69.2K
  • Sole-source awards43%
    US 30% · $30K
  • Single-offer competitions57%
    US 8.7% · $39.2K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Interior · 2 awards
  2. Department of Agriculture · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Agricultural Research Service· Pima County, AZ· Construction & real property· Jul 10, 2026 – Jul 10, 2026· 1232SA26F0364
  2. Agricultural Research Service· Pima County, AZ· Construction & real property· Aug 19, 2026 – Aug 19, 2026· 1232SA26P0532
  3. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Pinal County, AZ· Construction & real property· Apr 2, 2026 – Apr 2, 2026· 140A1126P0016
  4. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Maricopa County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Mar 2, 2026 – Mar 2, 2026· 140A1126P0029

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $507K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $2.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $2.9M reported

  1. SAN DIEGO, CA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  2. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BENTLEY, LA · 73% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons · Building equipment contractors
  2. BEAUMONT, TX · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons · Building equipment contractors
  3. DECATUR, AL · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons · Building equipment contractors

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.