Federal contractor · FARNBOROUGH

QINETIQ LIMITED

QINETIQ LIMITED received $5.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+21% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $20.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($5.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$5.3M
New awards
4
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
KVVWT8L1JHZ3
Parent company
VERITAS CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the QINETIQ INC. company family: 4 registered entities, $64.2M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. QINETIQ INC.LORTON, VA · Family page
    $53.1M
  2. $5.8M
  3. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 544.2KFY2020
  2. 3.5MFY2021
  3. 4.5MFY2022
  4. 1.9MFY2023
  5. 681.8KFY2024
  6. 4.4MFY2025
  7. 5.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$5.3M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$5.3M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $5.3M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $5.3M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 3 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Sep 24, 2025 – Oct 24, 2025· FA558725F0206
  2. Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· May 26, 2026 – May 26, 2026· FA558726F0097
  3. Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Nov 25, 2025 – Nov 25, 2025· FA558726F0016
  4. Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Feb 26, 2026 – Feb 26, 2026· FA558726F0073

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

17 companies · $14.5M reported

  1. PLACENTIA, CA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. STRUDYNE INC$1.7M
    MADISON, AL · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

17 companies · $84.9M reported

  1. SAN DIEGO, CA · 2 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. MCLEAN, VA · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FIBERTEK, INC.$198.3M+9.4% in FY2026
    HERNDON, VA · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. QED SYSTEMS, LLC$215.3M−39% in FY2026
    ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. JOINT TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC$253M−45% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of QINETIQ INC. (4 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • QinetiQ Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2026
$140K
3 reports
Lobbying · 2025–2026
$220K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2025$80K
    2 reports
  2. 2026$140K
    3 reports

Top issues

  1. Homeland security5 reports
  2. Defense1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES2 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. NICHOLS LAW PLLC$180K
    4 reports
  2. WASHINGTON BRIDGE ADVISORY LLC$40K
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.