Federal contractor · SAN DIEGO, CA

GENERAL ATOMICS

GENERAL ATOMICS received $478.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 132 awards (+20% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4.1B. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($401.5M). It also received $126M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$478.5M
New awards
132
Sole-source
97%
Single offer
0.4%
UEI
TVRYQ3N3B8H5
Parent company
DIAZYME LABORATORIES, INC.
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

12 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $479.8M in FY2026 together.

  1. GENERAL ATOMICSSAN DIEGO, CA · Family page
    $478.5M
  2. $1.9M
  3. GENERAL ATOMICSENGLEWOOD, CO
    $404.9K
  4. GENERAL ATOMICSSAN DIEGO, CA
    $70.6K
  5. $500
  6. $0
  7. GENERAL ATOMICSHUNTSVILLE, AL
    $0
  8. $0
  9. $0
  10. MILTEC CORPORATIONHUNTSVILLE, AL
    $0
  11. $0
  12. -$1.1M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · jev-1.13.0 · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 341.8MFY2017
  2. 620.7MFY2018
  3. 619.2MFY2019
  4. 448.5MFY2020
  5. 261.2MFY2021
  6. 229.1MFY2022
  7. 457.5MFY2023
  8. 239.7MFY2024
  9. 399.6MFY2025
  10. 478.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 49 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 74 awards
  5. 2 awards
  6. 3 awards
  7. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$384.8M80%
  2. Research & development$59.9M13%
  3. Professional services$19.8M4.1%
  4. Equipment maintenance$8.7M1.8%
  5. Other equipment & supplies$5.4M1.1%

Where the work was performed

  1. Lee County, MS$21.2M4.4%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition98%
    US 39% · $466.8M
  • Sole-source awards97%
    US 30% · $464.9M
  • Single-offer competitions0.4%
    US 8.8% · $1.9M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $46.6K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 18 awards
  2. Department of Energy · 1 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 11 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Dec 22, 2016 – May 21, 2026· N0001914C0037
  2. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Dec 28, 2021 – Jun 1, 2026· N0001922C0033
  3. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Dec 30, 2024 – Mar 24, 2026· N0001925F0028
  4. Department of Energy· San Diego County, CA· Research & development· Sep 30, 2024 – Sep 10, 2026· 89233124CNA000365
  5. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Research & development· May 9, 2022 – May 6, 2026· N6600122C4700
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· San Diego County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jul 6, 2020 – Sep 2, 2026· 80GSFC20C0093
  7. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Dec 28, 2022 – Apr 7, 2026· N0001923F0025
  8. Department of the Air Force· San Diego County, CA· Research & development· Sep 27, 2023 – Apr 23, 2026· FA240123C0013

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

GENERAL ATOMICS received $126M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 21 actions (6 new awards), +5.9% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 81.049 · Office of Science Financial Assistance Program ($124.6M).

Assistance · FY2026
$126M
New awards
6
Actions
21
Since FY2021
$713.6M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 115.2MFY2021
  2. 114.5MFY2022
  3. 123.1MFY2023
  4. 115.8MFY2024
  5. 119MFY2025
  6. 126MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$126M100%

Top programs

  1. 81.049 · Office of Science Financial Assistance Program$124.6M99%
  2. 81.135 · Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy$2.3M1.9%
  3. 81.086 · Conservation Research and Development-$27.5K0.0%
  4. 81.121 · Nuclear Energy Research, Development and Demonstration-$863.5K0.0%

Awarding agencies

Largest awards

  1. 81.049 · Office of Science Financial Assistance Program· Department of Energy· Cooperative agreement· Jan 20, 2021 – Aug 26, 2026· DEFC0204ER54698
  2. 81.121 · Nuclear Energy Research, Development and Demonstration· Department of Energy· Cooperative agreement· Dec 28, 2022 – Jun 17, 2026· DENE0009235
  3. 81.049 · Office of Science Financial Assistance Program· Department of Energy· Project grant· Apr 1, 2021 – Jul 15, 2026· DEFG0295ER54309
  4. 81.121 · Nuclear Energy Research, Development and Demonstration· Department of Energy· Cooperative agreement· Dec 15, 2021 – May 13, 2026· DENE0009052
  5. 81.049 · Office of Science Financial Assistance Program· Department of Energy· Cooperative agreement· Sep 28, 2023 – Jul 15, 2026· DESC0024425
  6. 81.049 · Office of Science Financial Assistance Program· Department of Energy· Project grant· Jul 13, 2026 – Jul 13, 2026· DESC0026389

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $16.2M (87 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $2.4M (34 subawards)

76 sub-recipients

  1. CHESTERLAND, OH · 2 subawards
  2. TITUSVILLE, PA · 3 subawards
  3. ADVANCED MACHINING AND TOOLING, LLC$1.8M9.7%
    POWAY, CA · 2 subawards
  4. ALLENTOWN, PA · 3 subawards
  5. MCCROMETER, INC.$559.9K3.0%
    HEMET, CA · 1 subaward
  6. WALTHAM, MA · 1 subaward
  7. AREA51-ESG, INC.$490.8K2.6%
    IRVINE, CA · 3 subawards
  8. ANAHEIM, CA · 2 subawards
  9. OAK RIDGE, TN · 8 subawards
  10. RIALTO, CA · 3 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $3.8M (3 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $540K (3 subawards)

6 primes

  1. LYNCHBURG, VA · 1 subaward
  2. MALIBU, CA · 1 subaward
  3. FORT COLLINS, CO · 1 subaward
  4. COLUMBUS, OH · 1 subaward
  5. CAMBRIDGE, MA · 1 subaward
  6. LA JOLLA, CA · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 3.4% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $5B paid out · $56.3M received
  • FY2022: $308.2M paid out · $5.6M received
  • FY2023: $586.4M paid out · $8.7M received
  • FY2024: $300.1M paid out · $6.2M received
  • FY2025: $61.7M paid out · $13.3M received
  • FY2026: $18.6M paid out · $4.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

428 companies · $6.3B reported

  1. PRECISION GRINDING INC$4.7B
    BIRMINGHAM, AL · 1 subaward · Ship and boat building
  2. WALTHAM, MA · 88 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. CINCINNATI, OH · 13 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes that pay it

38 companies · $105.8M reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 29 subawards · Ship and boat building
  2. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 12 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. TUCSON, AZ · 13 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 39 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RAM-SYSTEM GMBH$940.3M+11% in FY2026
    OTTOBRUNN, DEU · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION$3.5B−27% in FY2026
    INDIANAPOLIS, IN · 29 entities · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturingAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Ship and boat building
  3. BELL BOEING JOINT PROJECT OFFICE$3.6B−0.6% in FY2026
    AMARILLO, TX · 79% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of GENERAL ATOMICS (12 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Miltec CorporationAI match · 97%
  • GENERAL ATOMICSAI match · 95%
Lobbying · 2025
$7.7M
37 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$25.5M
$25.5M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$521.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$6.4M
    25 reports
  2. 2024$6.8M
    24 reports
  3. 2025$7.7M
    37 reports
  4. 2026$4.6M
    20 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense45 reports
  2. Energy and nuclear43 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations40 reports
  4. Homeland security25 reports
  5. Aerospace14 reports
  6. Foreign relations14 reports
  7. Science and technology4 reports
  8. Environment and Superfund3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE87 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES78 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Forbes-Tate$1.3M
    14 reports
  2. American Defense International, Inc.$1.3M
    14 reports
  3. Crossroads Strategies, LLC$360K
    6 reports
  4. GUIDEPOSTSTRATEGIES, LLC$280K
    10 reports
  5. A1.9 STRATEGIES LLC$260K
    10 reports
  6. MORAN GLOBAL STRATEGIES, INC.$210K
    6 reports
  7. WayPoint Consulting, LLC$200K
    1 reports
  8. Brian Glackin & Associates LLC$150K
    6 reports

13 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$348.5K67%
  2. Democratic$163K31%
  3. Other or none$10K1.9%

PACs sponsored

  • GENERAL ATOMICS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$1M raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.