Federal contractor · MALTA, ID
RANGE WATER SOLUTIONS & SUPPLIES LLC
RANGE WATER SOLUTIONS & SUPPLIES LLC received $197.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−58% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $2M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($183.6K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $197.6K
- New awards
- 6
- Sole-source
- 7.1%
- Single offer
- 93%
- UEI
- JHX7KY21Z8E7
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 8.5KFY2018
- 76.6KFY2019
- 99.3KFY2020
- 216.7KFY2021
- 595.6KFY2022
- 97KFY2023
- 204KFY2024
- 475.6KFY2025
- 197.6KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Forest Service$183.6K93%4 awards
- Bureau of Land Management$14K7.1%2 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$183.6K93%
- Other equipment & supplies$14K7.1%
Where the work was performed
- Sevier County, UT$146.6K74%
- Carbon County, UT$46.4K23%
- Ada County, ID$4,5802.3%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition100%US 39% · $197.6K
- Sole-source awards7.1%US 30% · $14K
- Single-offer competitions93%US 8.7% · $183.6K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of the Interior · 2 awards
Largest awards
- Forest Service· Sevier County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Jun 29, 2026 – Jun 29, 2026· 1202SB26M2148
- Forest Service· Carbon County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Jul 19, 2026 – Sep 9, 2026· 1202SB26M1517
- Forest Service· Sevier County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Jul 12, 2026 – Jul 12, 2026· 1202SB26M2495
- Bureau of Land Management· Sevier County, UT· Other equipment & supplies· Feb 23, 2026 – Feb 23, 2026· 140L5726P0004
- Bureau of Land Management· Ada County, ID· Other equipment & supplies· May 1, 2026 – May 1, 2026· 140L3726K0359
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- DONALD P KRIDER$765K−46% in FY2026PRINEVILLE, OR · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
- LEAN INNOVATIONS, INC$740.7K−62% in FY2026POWELL BUTTE, OR · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
- RT FORESTRY INC$914.1K−100% in FY2026TURNER, OR · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.