Federal contractor · LOVELL, WY
RED ORANGE NORTH AMERICA
RED ORANGE NORTH AMERICA received $981.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 12 awards (−29% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $6.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($399.7K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $981.2K
- New awards
- 12
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- MWFGYJ5MJ878
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
Part of the RED ORANGE NORTH AMERICA INC. company family: 2 registered entities, $16.2M in FY2026 together. See the family
- RED ORANGE NORTH AMERICA INC.FORT WASHINGTON, PA · Family page$15.2M
AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-29
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 74.3KFY2019
- 97.9KFY2020
- 897.1KFY2021
- 826.4KFY2022
- 875.1KFY2023
- 1.4MFY2024
- 1.4MFY2025
- 981.2KFY2026
- -33KFY2027
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$399.7K41%4 awards
- Department of Veterans Affairs$353.4K36%3 awards
- Department of the Air Force$64.6K6.6%1 awards
- 1 awards
- Defense Logistics Agency$47.9K4.9%1 awards
- Washington Headquarters Services$39.4K4.0%1 awards
- U.S. Secret Service$15K1.5%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Other equipment & supplies$358.2K37%
- Facilities & utilities$336.9K34%
- Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$191.7K20%
- Equipment maintenance$62.9K6.4%
- Transportation & logistics$31.5K3.2%
Where the work was performed
- Big Horn County, WY$385.7K39%
- Orange County, CA$275.6K28%
- Philadelphia County, PA$169.6K17%
- Bay County, FL$64.6K6.6%
- District of Columbia, DC$39.4K4.0%
- Richland County, SC$31.5K3.2%
- Westchester County, NY$15K1.5%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· Orange County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Mar 19, 2026 – Mar 19, 2026· W911SA26FA105
- Department of Veterans Affairs· Philadelphia County, PA· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 7, 2026 – Jul 7, 2026· 36C24426P0387
- Department of Veterans Affairs· Big Horn County, WY· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 10, 2026 – Sep 10, 2026· 36C26026P0703
- Department of Veterans Affairs· Richland County, SC· Transportation & logistics· May 1, 2022 – Oct 6, 2026· 36C24722P0478
- Defense Logistics Agency· Big Horn County, WY· Equipment maintenance· Feb 27, 2025 – Feb 27, 2026· SP330025P0442
- Department of the Army· Big Horn County, WY· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 24, 2026 – Jun 11, 2026· W911S226PA458
- Department of the Air Force· Bay County, FL· Other equipment & supplies· May 21, 2026 – May 21, 2026· FA481926P0025
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Big Horn County, WY· Facilities & utilities· Apr 21, 2026 – May 19, 2026· 80NSSC26P0459
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
1 company · $50.3K reported
- VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 1 subaward · Machinery, equipment, and supplies merchant wholesalers
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 142 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- E-9 CORPORATION$27.3M−43% in FY2026ALEXANDRIA, VA · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- NFB MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS, LLC$33.2M−67% in FY2026ARLINGTON, VA · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- TURTLE REEF HOLDINGS, LLC$14.9M+13% in FY2026ALEXANDRIA, VA · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesU.S. Special Operations Command · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.