Federal contractor · SIOUX CITY, IA

REGENCY CONSULTING INC

REGENCY CONSULTING INC received $55.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 240 awards (−53% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $482M. Its largest customer was Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources ($32.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$55.9M
New awards
240
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
40%
UEI
SC8LMLWA6H51
Parent company
REGENCY CONSULTING, INC
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-ownedHUBZone firmNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5.2MFY2017
  2. 4.9MFY2018
  3. 7.2MFY2019
  4. 28.7MFY2020
  5. 24.8MFY2021
  6. 50.3MFY2022
  7. 96.9MFY2023
  8. 89.1MFY2024
  9. 119.1MFY2025
  10. 55.9MFY2026
  11. 0FY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 69 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 7 awards
  4. 7 awards
  5. 26 awards
  6. 3 awards
  7. 9 awards
  8. 6 awards
  9. 9 awards
  10. 19 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$52.9M95%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$2.7M4.9%
  3. Equipment maintenance$290.4K0.5%
  4. Professional services$8,8890.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition40%
    US 39% · $22.6M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $8,889
  • Single-offer competitions40%
    US 8.7% · $22.6M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Health Agency· Bexar County, TX· IT & telecom· Sep 26, 2025 – May 7, 2026· HT001525FE062
  2. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources· Montgomery County, MD· IT & telecom· Sep 24, 2026 – Sep 24, 2026· 7571TE26F80367
  3. Defense Information Systems Agency· Arlington County, VA· IT & telecom· Sep 29, 2025 – May 14, 2026· HC108425F0413
  4. Transportation Security Administration· Woodbury County, IA· IT & telecom· Aug 28, 2024 – Jun 11, 2026· 70T03024F7667N064
  5. Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency· Prince William County, VA· IT & telecom· Jul 25, 2025 – Nov 21, 2025· HS002125FE067
  6. Defense Information Systems Agency· Woodbury County, IA· IT & telecom· Jul 31, 2023 – Jan 7, 2026· HC108423F0184
  7. Executive Office of the President· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Jul 31, 2026 – Jul 31, 2026· 11316026F0012OMB
  8. Indian Health Service· Woodbury County, IA· IT & telecom· May 27, 2025 – Oct 30, 2025· 75H71025F80160

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $298.7K (2 subawards)

1 prime

  1. FAIRFAX, VA · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $112.5K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $298.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $411.2K reported

  1. GROTON, CT · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. MELBOURNE, FL · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 93 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ANACAPA MICRO PRODUCTS, INC.$252.7M−14% in FY2026
    OXNARD, CA · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources · Computer systems design and related servicesTransportation Security Administration · Computer systems design and related servicesNational Institutes of Health · Computer systems design and related services+6 more
  2. STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS LLC$214.1M−50% in FY2026
    LOUISVILLE, KY · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Health Agency · Computer systems design and related servicesDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services+3 more
  3. TYTO GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS INC$178.4M−27% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Health Agency · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related services+1 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.