Federal contractor · MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

RELIABLE ROBOTICS CORPORATION

RELIABLE ROBOTICS CORPORATION received $2.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+141% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $10.1M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($2.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.4M
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
DG9XK6MHG4A7
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 49KFY2021
  2. 300KFY2022
  3. 2.4MFY2023
  4. 3.8MFY2024
  5. 1MFY2025
  6. 2.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$2.4M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Santa Clara County, CA· Research & development· Jul 22, 2026 – Jul 22, 2026· 80NSSC26C0071
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Santa Clara County, CA· Research & development· Aug 28, 2025 – Aug 25, 2026· 80NSSC25C0467

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. WECOSO, INC.$5.5M−95% in FY2026
    HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA · 73% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. ETA SPACE LLC$5.7M−74% in FY2026
    ROCKLEDGE, FL · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  3. PICKNIK INC.$5.1M−65% in FY2026
    BOULDER, CO · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • RELIABLE ROBOTICS CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$480K
14 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.5M
$1.5M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$9,750
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$400K
    13 reports
  2. 2024$380K
    13 reports
  3. 2025$480K
    14 reports
  4. 2026$280K
    7 reports

Top issues

  1. Aviation, aircraft and airlines29 reports
  2. Defense27 reports
  3. Transportation16 reports
  4. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  5. Telecommunications11 reports
  6. Aerospace7 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE40 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES38 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Cassidy & Associates, Inc.$530K
    15 reports
  2. RUBIN, TURNBULL & ASSOCIATES$180K
    7 reports
  3. PASSAGE CONSULTING GROUP LLC$89K
    10 reports
  4. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD$20K
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$6,00062%
  2. Democratic$3,75038%

PACs sponsored

  • RELIABLE ROBOTICS CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$25.5K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.