Federal contractor · ALAMEDA, CA

RGB SPECTRUM

RGB SPECTRUM received $417.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+17% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($417.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$417.2K
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
PR5JEZ1K24F6
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 42.5KFY2017
  2. -2.2KFY2018
  3. 31.1KFY2019
  4. 29.8KFY2020
  5. 29.2KFY2021
  6. 35.3KFY2022
  7. 20.5KFY2023
  8. 99.1KFY2024
  9. 357.5KFY2025
  10. 417.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$417.2K100%
    4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$417.2K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Alameda County, CA$417.2K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$29.7K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$29.7K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ELECTRONIC COMPONEN$446.9K
    Department of the Navy· Alameda County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Feb 2, 2026 – Feb 2, 2026· N0010426PQA60
  2. ENCODER,VIDEO$198K
    Department of the Navy· Alameda County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 16, 2025 – Dec 30, 2025· N0010425PDB64
  3. ENCODER,VIDEO$128.7K
    Department of the Navy· Alameda County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 9, 2025 – Oct 9, 2025· N0010425PDB13
  4. CIRCUIT CARD ASSEMB$1,100
    Department of the Navy· Alameda County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 24, 2025 – Dec 15, 2025· N0010425PDA95

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $587.8K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.6M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $3.2M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $644.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $7M reported

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$5.3M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 24 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$1M
    MELBOURNE, FL · 9 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.$490.7K
    HERNDON, VA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PRACTICAL COMPONENTS, INC$618.6K+284% in FY2026
    LOS ALAMITOS, CA · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing
  2. ROBERT M. HADLEY COMPANY, INC.$723.4K−96% in FY2026
    VENTURA, CA · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing
  3. CHENEGA MANUFACTURING SERVICES LLC$824K
    PANAMA CITY, FL · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.