Federal contractor · PHOENIX, AZ

RICHARD & KENNEDY ARCHITECTS, LLC

RICHARD & KENNEDY ARCHITECTS, LLC received $164.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−63% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $88M. Its largest customer was Department of State ($164.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$164.9K
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
GCEJCYY46QB1
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 7.8MFY2017
  2. 21.2MFY2018
  3. 13.3MFY2019
  4. 2.2MFY2020
  5. 17.1MFY2021
  6. 21.9MFY2022
  7. 3.8MFY2023
  8. 125.5KFY2024
  9. 451.1KFY2025
  10. 164.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of State$164.9K100%
    4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$164.9K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$164.9K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $164.9K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $164.9K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. A/E PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR NEW EMBASSY COMPOUND (NEC) DOHA, QATAR$12.6M
    Department of State· Maricopa County, AZ· Construction & real property· May 22, 2018 – Sep 28, 2026· 19AQMM18F1844
  2. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.$11.8M
    Department of State· Maricopa County, AZ· Construction & real property· May 7, 2018 – May 1, 2026· 19AQMM18F0643
  3. THIS IS FOR POST PROJECT GUANGZHOU FACADE REMEDIATION$1.2M
    Department of State· Construction & real property· May 12, 2020 – Apr 16, 2026· 19AQMM20F1750
  4. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN SERVICES IN FUKUOKA, JAPAN.$692.4K
    Department of State· Construction & real property· Sep 29, 2025 – May 18, 2026· 19AQMM25F1622

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KIRK ASSOCIATES LLC$728.4K
    GOODYEAR, AZ · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. KPFF INC$713.7K+383% in FY2026
    SEATTLE, WA · 2 entities · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ODA-ARCHITECTURE, P.C.$592.9K−118% in FY2026
    NEW YORK, NY · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.