Federal contractor · SEATTLE, WA

KPFF INC

KPFF INC received -$18.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−185% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $9M. Its largest customer was U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (-$18.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
-$18.2K
New awards
2
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
LPSGJWY5W7B7
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $362.5K in FY2026 together.

  1. KPFF INCSEATTLE, WA · Family page
    -$18.2K
  2. KPFF, INC.PORTLAND, OR
    $380.7K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.2MFY2017
  2. 1.4MFY2018
  3. 865.7KFY2019
  4. 3.5MFY2020
  5. 1.6MFY2021
  6. 379.3KFY2022
  7. 110.4KFY2023
  8. 5.4KFY2024
  9. 21.4KFY2025
  10. -18.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service-$18.2K0.0%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

  1. Jefferson County, ID$41.5K0.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. CREEK RESTORATION DESIGN AT CAMAS NWR$309.7K
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Jefferson County, ID· Construction & real property· Sep 14, 2021 – Apr 24, 2026· 140F0821P0015
  2. OR-DIV OF ENGINEERING-A&E SVCS PUMP STAT$188.1K
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Glenn County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 21, 2020 – Feb 26, 2026· 140F0120F0237

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $156.2K (2 subawards)

2 primes

  1. REID MIDDLETON, INC.$97.8K63%
    EVERETT, WA · 1 subaward
  2. TETRA TECH, INC.$58.4K37%
    MARLBOROUGH, MA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $241.2K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $2M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $3.8M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.9M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $639.5K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $156.2K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

13 companies · $8.9M reported

  1. AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.$3.3M
    LOS ANGELES, CA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. REID MIDDLETON, INC.$2.7M
    EVERETT, WA · 8 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. BRATSLAVSKY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.$1.3M
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KIRK ASSOCIATES LLC$728.4K
    GOODYEAR, AZ · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. RICHARD & KENNEDY ARCHITECTS, LLC$741.6K−63% in FY2026
    PHOENIX, AZ · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ODA-ARCHITECTURE, P.C.$592.9K−118% in FY2026
    NEW YORK, NY · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.