Federal contractor · FRANKLIN, TN

RUSTICI SOFTWARE, LLC

RUSTICI SOFTWARE, LLC received $1.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+139% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($961K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.4M
New awards
6
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
XCGFHMLY9421
Parent company
LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES GROUP PLC
Small businessForeign-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 605.9KFY2017
  2. 581.2KFY2018
  3. 117.3KFY2019
  4. 468.8KFY2020
  5. 580.8KFY2021
  6. 557.9KFY2022
  7. 563.7KFY2023
  8. 572.3KFY2024
  9. 588.8KFY2025
  10. 1.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$1.4M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.4M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $1.4M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  3. Department of Justice · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Williamson County, TN· IT & telecom· Jan 30, 2026 – Jan 30, 2026· W519TC26CA011
  2. Department of the Navy· Williamson County, TN· IT & telecom· May 29, 2025 – May 21, 2026· N6833525C0407
  3. Federal Bureau of Investigation· Williamson County, TN· IT & telecom· Apr 10, 2024 – Jul 8, 2026· 15F06724P0000635
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention· DeKalb County, GA· IT & telecom· Mar 24, 2025 – Jun 9, 2026· 75D30125P00129
  5. Department of the Navy· Nueces County, TX· IT & telecom· Apr 17, 2026 – Apr 17, 2026· N6883626P0017
  6. Drug Enforcement Administration· Williamson County, TN· IT & telecom· Jan 20, 2026 – Jan 20, 2026· 15DDTR26P00000012

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $134.7K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.4M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.9M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $3.4M reported

  1. BETHESDA, MD · 4 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. RESTON, VA · 6 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. FORT WORTH, TX · 1 subaward · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KONGSBERG GEOSPATIAL LTD.$1.9M−81% in FY2026
    OTTAWA, CAN · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Software publishersNavy · Software publishers
  2. CENTENNIAL, CO · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Software publishersNavy · Software publishersNavy · Computer systems design and related services+1 more
  3. HIREVUE INC$1.8M+8.1% in FY2026
    SOUTH JORDAN, UT · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Software publishers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.