Federal contractor · SAINT IGNATIUS, MT

S & K AEROSPACE, LLC

S & K AEROSPACE, LLC received $60.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 234 awards (+15% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $666.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($31.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$60.2M
New awards
234
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
9.6%
UEI
WVJKC2L1ZN11
Small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $60.4M in FY2026 together.

  1. S & K AEROSPACE, LLCSAINT IGNATIUS, MT · Family page
    $60.2M
  2. S & K AEROSPACE LLCWARNER ROBINS, GA
    $186.7K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 245.8MFY2017
  2. -11MFY2018
  3. 131MFY2019
  4. 111.2MFY2020
  5. 69.7MFY2021
  6. 47.7MFY2022
  7. -16.6MFY2023
  8. -23.8MFY2024
  9. 52.2MFY2025
  10. 60.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 20 awards
  2. 182 awards
  3. 28 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$33M55%
  2. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$21.5M36%
  3. Professional services$5.6M9.3%
  4. IT & telecom$6,5460.0%
  5. Equipment maintenance$1,0000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition9.5%
    US 39% · $5.7M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$17.2K
  • Single-offer competitions9.6%
    US 8.7% · $5.8M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Lake County, MT· Professional services· May 20, 2022 – May 7, 2026· FA857522C0002
  2. Department of the Navy· Lake County, MT· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Aug 6, 2025 – May 28, 2026· N0038325FED00
  3. Department of the Air Force· Lake County, MT· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Dec 9, 2024 – Feb 9, 2026· FA853225F0087
  4. Department of the Air Force· Lake County, MT· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 8, 2026 – Apr 8, 2026· FA853226F0138
  5. Department of the Navy· Lake County, MT· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 7, 2026 – May 12, 2026· N0038326FED00
  6. Defense Logistics Agency· Solano County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 24, 2026 – Jun 9, 2026· SPRMM126FE70J
  7. Department of the Air Force· Lake County, MT· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 9, 2026 – Mar 9, 2026· FA853226F0079
  8. Department of the Air Force· Peach County, GA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· May 18, 2026 – May 18, 2026· FA853226F0170

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $7.6M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $33.8M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $19.7M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

27 companies · $61.1M reported

  1. CHATSWORTH, CA · 9 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 3 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. BYRON, GA · 6 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 21 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. 4M HR LOGISTICS LLC$82M−41% in FY2026
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. STRATEGIC MISSION SYSTEMS, LLC$78.3M−77% in FY2026
    MIDWEST CITY, OK · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. LEARJET INC$92.6M−79% in FY2026
    WICHITA, KS · 3 entities · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.